stningjing

Hi,Mr.amigoro,plz rate it

1:25 1:33 Creating an appealing image has become more important in contemporary society than is the reality or truth behind that image. Generally speaking,i do not agree with the speaker's assertation,as opposed to his view,in my opinion,as the the world progressed more advanced,we are graduly moving closely to the truth as never before,with the spruting of the newly developed modern technology,guided by the experience accumulated along the history. For one thing,in the field of the science,people become more and more aware the facts and more and more questionable to the existent classic theory,such spirit,the spitrit to chanllenge the authority,to explore the reality of this world,is applauded by most of the people,and in turn leading to such trend in the research that is more relastical,more practical,more careful.on the other hand,nowadays,with the advent of the more na d more advanced communication networks,mopre and more demoracy environtment for the reserachers,people tend to get the truth much easily,on the contrary,the intention to conceal the truth through making some falsified and transorformed image is left much less space than before.The best example is any theism produced through copy the other person 's idea is turned very hard nowadays,in china,a scholar once being punished by such ill transcation ,even though,he appear to be so smart and respected by so many followers in the studinmg field. In the realm of the politics,the populace paied more attention to the really acts and performance rather than the rhetoric or any wonderful idea,rather than the vague promise,they paied more attention to their own interests,not the socalled national interests which is usually being the pretext for the dictator to attain his own personal desire,to suppress the protest of the populace.It is the ideas which already have been proven by the advanced country that give the light to the backward country,in this sensse,the idea of democracy play a very important role in disclose the cover placed by the each dictatorship ,especially,accompaning the new electronic inventions and the Internet,any events ,anywhere,around the world,can be touched by the masses,thus,to fool the people through some sophiscated traditional tricks come more and more wihtout result,more and more dictator appeared smart in the propagnda have been overthrowed by the facts or the truth obtained in the hand of the most great people. In sum,actually,we are happy to live in such world ,since we are living more and more closely to the truth,and not easily being cheated by some images on the surface. 14:25

17:27 When we concern ourselves with the study of history, we become storytellers. Because we can never know the past directly but must construct it by interpreting evidence, exploring history is more of a creative enterprise than it is an objective pursuit. All historians are storytellers The author argues that the history is more subjective enterprise rather than the objective one,and for each one studying with the history is just regarded as a story-teller ,however,in my opinion,the objectivity can not be left out , objectiveity is more important in studying the history. No one will deny that the history is dealing with the facts occured during the course of the history,in this point,history is objective,to study the history,people have to present the evidence to demonstrate the idea of their view of the history,just by narration without the stronger evidence,that is called fiction or folk legend, which is distinctive to the history,history is a science, thus,the history is actually seen pursuing the truth of the past as its destination,for this reason,numberous of college student have to be stricitly trained before enganging into the studying field to guarrante the objectivity of their study,all the same,the history studig have to employ the elaborate instrument to accomplish each study,thus by no means we should call history just as a story. On the other side,although people are studying the same affairs in the history,due to the different angle of the standpoint,different ethinic,or different value view,the fact can not be reflected by the same tone,in this point,we may call it subjectivity,after all,it is the people who are studying the history ,and the people is easily being affected by several factors.Take the example of the war between china and japan during 1930-1940,the chinese call those japanese troops invader,yet,to Japan,they are regarded as the national hero. To the politician ,history is easily being transdormed in order to satisfy their personal needs,in japan,in the case of the "nanjing"masscare which happened during the 2nd world war and got 300000 citizen of nanjing citizen lost their lives,some people just shout out that such case is a fake,and ignore the fact which have already been proven by the stacks of the evideces,and commonly known all aroud the world except japan,to them,the history is really a subjective enterprise at their own will. All in all,as what i have disscussed above,although,history is subjective sometimes,however for the people who are pursuing the truth,they must try to study it as objective as possible. 18:10

Thank you wood,I will win.See you.

A barrel of thanks to you,wood,i know it is a hard work for you to read my issue,i am gratified for your patience to rectify my work,i wiil fix them as soon as possible ,after all only 3 days left.My desire in the test is 4.0 scores,is that possible?Thanks a lot wood,your response is appreciated .

Hi,wood,admire ur perfect master of english,could you help me to rate my esay,i am in the sea of non-englishspoken plz help me to rate this article

Rate it Mr. Erin

Most people live, whether physically or morally, in a very restricted circle. They make use of a very limited portion of the resources available to them until they face a great problem or crisis. 11:30 This claim sounds quite pessimistic unnecessarily,we can not deny we are conditioned by the limite dresources,yet the truth is that in most of cases ,we turned out as the winner,and striving for the aimed idea in th elimited circumstance make us feel self confident,even sometimes failed ,we gained much either,other wise,i guess our life will become dull,and th esociety would bogged into stagnation. Restropect to the human history,appearing as caved man,naked body,with tools of sytone,we started out process aimed at emancipating the mass fromt he restraint of the nature,not as the claim stated above,we already prove that we are making progress in the most corners of the world ,we steped out from the primitive conditions, wearing decent clothes,enjoy the leisure brought by our own achievements which is based on the limited conditions laid upon by the nature, just like this ,little by little,we are striving out of certain limits,making a real progress at our will. Morally,such limitation is essential for maintain the stable situation for the society,as opposed to his calim,it is the limited dcondition,and stern moral regulations that guarantte the continuous progress,prevent the violent conflicits from scrambling.Nowadays,the environment problem is the hot topic concerned around the world,given the destructive effects upon to the daily lives of our humanbeing,the people come together to signed a pact in detering such tredency,clearly,it is pressure coming from the nature,from the restricted reality that push the people to be more solidified,in the term of moral,we are making advance,our spirit is lift up,the strengthened ptriotism afte rth ecollapse of the twin is a remarkable example. In sum,i believe it is the harsh condition that injected us the powerful force in the path of the sucessful progress ,both physically and morally,we are getting out of the stagnation set upon by th eoriginall condition,as the history and reality already tell us. 12:15

Please comment on my issue.plz rate it thanks alot

This idea sounds like the policy abosrbed by our government before 1980,and has lead our nation in to the stagation whatever in terms of economy,or arts itself,such result has already forced our government abandoned it,it is clear that we should not follow its idea any more given the lesson we have been taught. Society is composed of so many sorts of individual,some borned with the talent in some field,some maybe unfortunate with some unchangable physical defects,some one is diligent,some one is on the contrary a little bit lazy,should we deprive the rights of the progressive individual to have a more comfortable life style such as enjoying the arts just for the reason of those poor group who can not survive by their own work?I thought the basic principle for the effective ands thriving society to stand is that any policy should represent the majority of the society,in this world,most of the society ,almost be the same that they have few member who can not even survive by their assiduous work,thus it is not fair to penalize the succeed one in survival rather than award them for their dedication to the whole scoeity,though i am not saying that we should leave the poor away.Usa is a remarkable example,in that society,the benefits of the majority is embodyed by their sound national mechanism,any alws enacted by the government should take the populace's interests into consideration,the arts is flourishing in the usa,which presnet much fun to the leisure time for the individual,yet on the othe rhand,the issue of the poorer is also draws much attentionof the government. A sound social system should encourage the people to vie for the better life under the just environment,much forcus on the problem of the poor ,with no propotional reimbursement to the contributor, will damp the ardor of the competitor,held back the advancement of the society,in nature,no one is willing to endure the hard time when the leisure style of life is offered whenthere is any any difference between the position of winner and defeater.Arts as a entertainment for the populace,can not be enjoyed untill they have at least survived in this society,if as claimed by the author,people should save money planed for the development of arts,poured them for the improvement of the living condition of poor,i doubt most of people will prefer to be a poor in that they can easily ameliorate their own lives with the help from the other hardworking freely,i think in this point,i do not stand alone. In sum,although we should be sympathy with those poor individual,we can not do it just at the cost of the majority or by sacrifying the interests of the deserver.

Topic: High-speed electronic communication media, such as electronic mail and television, tend to prevent meaningful and thoughtful communication High-speed electronic communications media are emerging affluently all the world,which faciliates the way the mass communicate.It folowed that less face to face contact seems gradually dewindles,then should we place the blame on the advance communication media as proclaimed above,i oppose his idea definitely. With the advent of this flood of communications media advancement,Our lives has been intensively transformed,to large extent,to a more favorable and conventious style.It is simply because the change and the speed of our society is accerelated at an unprecedented monmentous,which is propeled by the implusion coming from the brealthrough of the other fields.In order to accomdate to this trend,and oriented onself in the advantagous position facing up to the more competive challenge,this set of modern communication media is essential. Much contrast to the mentioned centerpoint above,instead of impede the meaningful and thoughtful contact,these devices provide the customer the more timely informations than any old-fashioned devices could offer,thanks to these instrument,the people can deal with the complicated problems with ease,which can be exemplified in the various of fields.On the stockmarket,time is money,the instant supply of stock information guarantee the custormer the equal chance to compete with the each other ,avoiding the distavange resulted from such factors as the distance.In htis pint,no one would deny that this information is immeaningful for the businessman awaiting the meaaages linked to his personal weath.e-mail ,as a most poweful communication method,links all the world together,at a more fast speed, transmitting the latesed news and personal mesages,than any traditional mail,AAAAAAAAny one can imagine,how urgent the information from a younger solider fighting in the gulf war is to the mother in the states,should we call the email which is much helpful in realising the mother's desire to hear his son's voice meaningless.Further more,the modern communication media can be regared as a powerful propaganda machine in overthrowing those dictatorships,the spontaneous disintegration of soviet union is largely result of the democracy idea acted upon those suffering masses bythe ousideworld.Shold we call this communication unthoughtful,no one. Yet,anyhow,every coin has both sides,the frequent appliance of the modern decices is bound to make the traditional communication ways less refered,however,all the communications ways,be it traditional or advanced,they are under the control of our humanbeings,as a mindless tools ,they are manipulated by the hunambeings at their wills,according to the different requirement.I must stress here the traditional communications is important in some cases,which can not be effectivley served bythe modern ways.However,as the these communications is in our hand,no doubt,w ecan make a wiseful chice between them. In sum,neither of them should be neglected in the service for the modern society,the are not sperated,given the ability of the humanbeing to choose the suitable ways in dealthing with the various situations,the view mentions above is groundless.