Thanks, you guys! I can see people almost back up the validity of economic modelling since it indeed is the sign of economics.
However, I have one question that's been puzzling for a long time. Is there any research that shows the relationship between the (neo-classical) modelling and the actual behavior? By this I mean on the one hand we make our decisions in the real world almost doing no calculations (Bayes Rule, complicated probability and so on), while on the other hand, in economic models, each step is math intensed. Without such connection, how can the results of researches that build on these models with smart agents (even for many BE models as mentioned) be reliable? So far, I can only recall John List'
s paper on the comparison between Neoclassical and Prospect theory in the field showing that for experienced subjects neoclassical theory works well.:hmm: