The Earth’s rivers constantly carry dissolved salts into its oceans. Clearly, therefore, by taking the resulting increase in salt levels in the oceans over the past hundred years and then determining how many centuries of such increases it would have taken the oceans to reach current salt levels from a hypothetical initial salt-free state, the maximum age of the Earth’s oceans can be accurately estimated.
Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?
A. The quantities of dissolved salts deposited by rivers in the Earth’s oceans have not been unusually large during the past hundred years.
B. At any given time, all the Earth’s rivers have about the same salt levels.
C. There are salts that leach into the Earth’s oceans directly from the ocean floor.
D. There is no method superior to that based on salt levels for estimating the maximum age of the Earth’s oceans.
E. None of the salts carried into the Earth’s oceans by rivers are used up by biological activity in the oceans.
In my opinion,
A can be discarded because even if the salt quantity being deposited is large, it would mot make any difference to our assumption.
B can be discarded because it is never said in the paragraph that the all the rivers on earth have the same concentration of salt at any given time.
C can be discarded because there is nothing like that in the paragraph.
D is better because of the two words, “clearly” and “accurately”, being used in second sentence of the paragraph.
E is also a preferred option because if it is true then it would help us estimate the age more accurately.
So answer is D according to me.
I am a new comer here so please give me some feedback about my thought process.
Thanks.