I understand the confusion so I'll try to clear it up a little. Initially, I wanted to know which PhD programs in Canada have the highest probability of placing students in a top-10 tenure track. The reason I wanted to know this is to decide where I should be thinking about going to get a PhD if I decided to get a PhD in Canada.
Once I have decided which PhD programs in Canada are most favourable for me based on the above criteria, it becomes, by association, easier to choose which university would be a desirable location to obtain the MA at. The logic here is that it is probably easier to get into, say, the PhD program at UofT if one also does the MA at UofT as opposed to doing the MA at Queen's or UBC because you may get references internally from the department. The same applies for all the other permutations: its probably easier to get into the PhD program at Queen's if one goes to the MA program at Queen's, etc. Additionally, if I were to do the MA at, say, Queen's, maybe it would be possible to get credit for some of the MA courses that I would complete during the MA and count them towards the PhD at Queen's (but if I would transfer to, say, UBC, that might no longer be possible; it all depends on departmental policy).
So I hope that clears up the confusion a little bit. It's kind of like a decision problem where you are starting from the result you want to obtain and work your way back in the decision tree towards the starting position.
As far as the fields that I am interested in are concerned, there appears to be significant overlap between them and all of the top 4 schools. Financial is deifinitely a field that I am interested in, as is development, monetary, information, labour, and international. I know that this is a relatively long list, but I wouldn't mind doing research in any of these fields, and I am sure that my interests and level of specialization will become more refined as I continue my education. Perhaps UWO is the best choice based on the above, while UBC might also be a good choice because of their strong monetary and labour groups.