anthony889

Yes you're right, I made a similar question few months ago but than the options have changed. I have excluded the GSE and need to decide between the two programs at the MIT and LSE. While the first is 6 time more expensive than the second, the two options are very similar. At the moment I am inclined toward the LSE (because of stimulating environment and the better network it would give me, given that I will probably look for a job in Europe after the phd) but I can't figure out how big is the gap between the two universities.

Dear all, I am facing a very hard decision. I am a phd candidate in economics, I won a scholarship that finance a year of study in a top university. I got accepted to three programs: 1) GSE Master in Macroeconomic Policy and Financial Markets 2) LSE Visiting Research Student With this program I have the possibility of working to my research project and at the same time attend 4 full courses (equivalent to a master). This is a non-degree program 3) MIT - Advanced Study Program. This is a non-degree program that allows to attend 6 to 8 courses at the MIT. What would you do?

Dear all, as the title suggest, I am trying to decide what master to choose to pursue a career in the financial institutions, such as Central Banks, IMF, World Bank but also research departments of Banks, rating agencies and think-tanks. Thanks to a great scholarship I don't have any budget limit. What master would you choose (and why) among: -Master in Finance, Barcelona GSE -MSc Finance and Economics, LSE -Master in Economic Policy, UCL At the moment I am tempted by the master at the GSE, because of the program, and the feeling that GSE is more suitable for a career of this kind. However, LSE brand seems to me much stronger and on linkedin there are much more graduates from LSE in this kind of institutions. I would much appreciate if you would suggest me other good options. Thanks!