pet_ra

Today is my GRE exam Please check this i'll do my best in 30 minutes please give me also as many advices as you think is enough to improve my writting in several hours... thank you for all There is a general idea that a translation always fails to preserve some of the qualities that distinguish the original work—i.e., that 'something always gets lost in translation.' Writers, critics, and the general reading public unthinkingly accept this clichè. But this belief is unwarranted: translators are sometimes distinguished authors themselves, and some authors may even translate their own works. As the translator pointed out in the preface to an English version of Dante's works, the violin and the piano make different sounds, but they can play what is recognizably the same piece of music. In the following topic the author states that the belief in the translation that is expected to lost the general idea of work is unwarrented. However to prove the following statement he takes into consideration some convincing and shortsighted claims. The author indicates that the translation is not lost when the translators are distinguished authors themselves. Moreover the author notes that there are authors who are the translators for their works. However, this claim highlightes only particular group of literal workers. Actually the literal world is full of artists and many of them know only native language and have no concern to translators. Thus this claim requires a more comprehensive study. Then the author cited the one's translator phrase. The meaning of the statement is that the transalted work and the original sound differently but recognizably mean the same. But the author doen't take into account that the purpose of translation is to rewrite the original exactly on the other language.The translation of essay is not an essay but exact retyping of original on the other language. Summarizing all, the author assumption is plausible only according particular type of writers but full of fallacies generally.

Today is my GRE exam Please check this i'll do my best in 30 minutes please give me also as many advices as you think is enough to improve my writting in several hours... thank you for all There is a general idea that a translation always fails to preserve some of the qualities that distinguish the original work—i.e., that 'something always gets lost in translation.' Writers, critics, and the general reading public unthinkingly accept this clichè. But this belief is unwarranted: translators are sometimes distinguished authors themselves, and some authors may even translate their own works. As the translator pointed out in the preface to an English version of Dante's works, the violin and the piano make different sounds, but they can play what is recognizably the same piece of music. In the following topic the author states that the belief in the translation that is expected to lost the general idea of work is unwarrented. However to prove the following statement he takes into consideration some convincing and shortsighted claims. The author indicates that the translation is not lost when the translators are distinguished authors themselves. Moreover the author notes that there are authors who are the translators for their works. However, this claim highlightes only particular group of literal workers. Actually the literal world is full of artists and many of them know only native language and have no concern to translators. Thus this claim requires a more comprehensive study. Then the author cited the one's translator phrase. The meaning of the statement is that the transalted work and the original sound differently but recognizably mean the same. But the author doen't take into account that the purpose of translation is to rewrite the original exactly on the other language.The translation of essay is not an essay but exact retyping of original on the other language. Summarizing all, the author assumption is plausible only according particular type of writers but full of fallacies generally.

Today is my GRE exam Please check this i'll do my best in 45 minutes please give me also as many advices as you think is enough to improve my writting in several hours... thank you for all the most practical and effective way to protect wilderness areas is to attract more tourists to these areas through environmentally sensative projects. The central issue of the topic is protecting wilderness areas. The author states that attracting more tourists to these territories make them to be saved. But, on my point of view, such popular attention to wild areas would only spoil the environmental situation there. This point is proved in the following paragraphs. First of all, it is required to understand the term “environmentally sensative projects”. The project is surely expected to be organized in a way when no wild animal or plant is worried. The tourists, who are going to such trips, have had an exciting possibility to get acquanted with wildness life. However, all people, should be very responsible and attentive to the nature, travelling in such special areas. Nevertheless, the wilderness attracting tourists has been actually destroyed by its popularity. Everyone want to touch the wild nature that has lessened every year. The “wild” places have given a lot of money to tourists agencies. Many groups have gone to these extraordinary areas but surely there has been no possibility to ensure if all people, who are visiting wilderness territories, have been responsible to the nature and sensitive to the environment. That is the main cause why there have been environmental problems on Niagara fall, Victoria lake and many other wild places. The birds have flied away from Niagara as lot of technical loud machines has appeared there, the wild animal have left Victoria lake as they are afraid of groups of people who have come to their land. The wilderness area has become a popular tourist place and no wild nature is there now. Even somebody claims that the most practical and effective way to save wilderness territories is to make profit from them, that is not true. The more groups are visiting Niagara the less it looks like wild place. Some projects are even prepared to build nearby several hotels. Thus the money which has been get from the wild place have spent not for environment protecting but for further development of tourist in the “wild” area. Summarizing all, the most effective way to protect wild nature is not to disturbe it. If the visiting of there areas had been beneficial for them the number of wild places would have been constant but not lessened as it has happened nowadays.

Today is my GRE exam Please check this i'll do my best in 45 minutes please give me also as many advices as you think is enough to improve my writting in several hours... thank you for all the most practical and effective way to protect wilderness areas is to attract more tourists to these areas through environmentally sensative projects. The central issue of the topic is protecting wilderness areas. The author states that attracting more tourists to these territories make them to be saved. But, on my point of view, such popular attention to wild areas would only spoil the environmental situation there. This point is proved in the following paragraphs. First of all, it is required to understand the term “environmentally sensative projects”. The project is surely expected to be organized in a way when no wild animal or plant is worried. The tourists, who are going to such trips, have had an exciting possibility to get acquanted with wildness life. However, all people, should be very responsible and attentive to the nature, travelling in such special areas. Nevertheless, the wilderness attracting tourists has been actually destroyed by its popularity. Everyone want to touch the wild nature that has lessened every year. The “wild” places have given a lot of money to tourists agencies. Many groups have gone to these extraordinary areas but surely there has been no possibility to ensure if all people, who are visiting wilderness territories, have been responsible to the nature and sensitive to the environment. That is the main cause why there have been environmental problems on Niagara fall, Victoria lake and many other wild places. The birds have flied away from Niagara as lot of technical loud machines has appeared there, the wild animal have left Victoria lake as they are afraid of groups of people who have come to their land. The wilderness area has become a popular tourist place and no wild nature is there now. Even somebody claims that the most practical and effective way to save wilderness territories is to make profit from them, that is not true. The more groups are visiting Niagara the less it looks like wild place. Some projects are even prepared to build nearby several hotels. Thus the money which has been get from the wild place have spent not for environment protecting but for further development of tourist in the “wild” area. Summarizing all, the most effective way to protect wild nature is not to disturbe it. If the visiting of there areas had been beneficial for them the number of wild places would have been constant but not lessened as it has happened nowadays.

A group of 20 values has mean 85 and median 80. A different group of 30 values has mean 75 and median 72. (a) What is the mean of the 50 values? ans is 79. please advise mean - arithmetic average

thanks i will work on it do you think examples of Li Yakoka and Bubka don't suit

please rate issue 1 hour "Sometimes imagination is a more valuable asset than experience. People who lack experience are free to imagine what is possible and thus can approach a task without constraints of established habits and attitudes." The knowledge is required everywhere, in any thing and area. Experience give us the information of possibilities and the improvement of skills. On my opinion imagination comparing to experience can't be a rush to approach a task. Surely, the imagination may be indicated as the main kick for artists. Nevertheless celebrities as all other ordinary people have acted according to their habits. Works of particular artist can be identified by his technics, details he used in his works. One of the Raffael's masterpiece is the picture of his last love. However there is no proof who was she, a baker daughter or bride of Raphael's patron. But Raphael did paint another portrait of a woman who has been really identified as his last lover. In this paint the rich lady is closed and demure opposite unknown lady who is naked and bold. But all details, chin, color of cheek, eyes, and mouth and the position of body and arms incline to identification the unknown woman as the femme fatale for Raffael. However the knowledge and experience is important nowadays as well. In order to become an owner of any business, to produce, to sell or to service the future boss should at least have an idea about the things he wants to work with. However, the statistics shows that half of such business are died because of lack of professionalism. The real successors have been those one who have known a lot in things they have carried out. One of the directors of Ford, Li Yakoka, was extremely successful later in the same position in Kraysler. The previous director of Kraysler was a man who had no experience and market feeling. Li Yakoka understood automobile manufacturing thus move Kraysler from crisis to benefit. Even people says that it should forget about limits in order to make difference the following example may proof the opposite. Bubka, a professional sportsmen in jumping, worked a long time to make the world record in jumping. Actually he crashed the conception of human abilities in sport. His record has not still reached by any of sportsmen in jumping. But up to the time of his compelling achievement he wasn't inexperienced sportsmen. Only Bubka's serious efforts has caused the achieved result. Summarizing all, it has be conclude that according to several examples the imagination is not the main cause for breaking limits. The dreams are actually involve to achieve high results but the approach of a task is achieved by mixture of human efforts and his knowledge.

thank you i will work on it and send you also issue today

The following appeared in a memo from the economic minister of the small country Paucia. "Using a newly developed variety of seed, farmers in our neighboring country Abundia produced 80 percent more rice last year than in any previous year. To increase the income of farmers in our own country, we should encourage them to cultivate this new variety of rice rather than some of their traditional crops. Such high yields of rice will also improve our country's balance of trade by enabling us to begin exporting it." Using a newly developed variety of seed, checked by experts on its favorable yield, is a available way to produce a big amount of the product for farmers.The author presents information regarding the harvest which neighboring country got using one modernized type of rice seed. He also claim that it will be profitable for his country to use the same seed as well. Presenting his assumptions, he lacks a lot of facts according to which he will be able to support his claims. First of all, the author starts by stating that farmers in neighboring country produced 80 percent more rice last year than in any previous year. However, in doing so he doesn't take into consideration different conditions which had been previous years. There could be various nature disasters, environment problems, farmers inactivity. Moreover, the economic minister assumpts that using the newly developed variety of seed in his country encourages it to increase farmers income but there are no information from neighboring country if the modernized rice seed was used only last year. If it was used previous years the other causes of great harvest exists. The neighbor could give a lot of money previous years to make earth favorable, to organize techlogical process, to involve farmers in growing the newly developed variety of seed. Thus the mentioned claim about profit in neighboring country required more details. Furthermore, he mentioned that high yields would be received by encouraging farmers to use the new rice seed. But the harvest depends not only on farmers and products they are growing. Does the soil in the country fit for rice cultivating? Is the earth the same in authors country and neighboring? Does the climate conditions are equal? It is seemed that the claim about high yields is faltering and shortsighted. Moreover, the minister noted about farmers involving but he has to take into account the farmers should be acquainted how to grow the product. Do they really want to change traditional rice to unknown rice? The changes should be made in farmers minds, the new package of knowledge should be presented to them and there is no information how long all these changes will take and how much will it cost for the country. In other words, the author's evidence about high profit for country is absolutely implausible. Finally, country balance of trade depends not only on high income of farmers and different time it may increase or decrease influencing any area from which country receives money. And the favor which the author is expected from exporting the rice should be honored. The rice should be on a high demand on the market, should have the quality according to well-known standards and should be in a suitable place to be transported. Summarizing all, although the newly developed variety of seed may be a cause of such a great increase of farmers income in neighboring country, it may not be the only factor of the great harvest. The author assumption is flawed as it relies on series of unsubstantiated premises and fallacious reasoning. argument, please rate oh, it takes me 1.05 what should i do?

thank you very much i'll try and take your advices into consideration i have exam in 5 days may it be convinient to send you some essays also and not only issue? thank you you are my great GRE helper)

? are dash here please rate my analysis of an issue thanks

"It is always an individual who is the impetus for innovation; the details may be worked out by a team, but true innovation results from the enterprise and unique perception of an individual." The amount of information to work out increases very quickly nowadays. Now to prepare any mechanical stuff hundreds or thousands people are working, each in his narrow filed. Today the team is highly important step on developing and realizing any idea but anyway it is not the rush which only individual can carry out. Instead of person who has a lot of ideas living in his mind the team is usually a group of people organized to solve particular problem. As more persons it counts more ideas in theirs heads are existing. The team has no one-way critical reasoning as people are thinking differently and every worker has own outlook to the discussed problem. Actually the task of a team is not to generate ideas but fulfill, develop and realize. However how good the idea is the team has been still on high demand. For instance, the idea of any manufacture could die a commercial death without team. One businessman who has owned cereal manufacture has an idea to add soy protein to the wheat that his factory uses. His decision was made according to statistic information that people who are eating soybeans have a lower cholesterol level comparing to people who are not eating soybeans at all. But his decision is full of empty parts which the team has to fulfill. First of all he needs experts in wheat manufacturing to know the proportion of possible soy protein supplement. Moreover the management team has to work on the idea. It needs to serf the market and search for manufactures who have already implemented the idea in life. The advertising departure should work seriously under the new product to show the society the real profit of it. Thus the idea is surely nothing without a team. Summarizing all, the idea created by individual and team have to coexist. Very little amount of inventors could implement ideas in life without team and surely the work area of an invention is minimal. Imagine that team is ?0? and idea is ?1?. Team is zero without a rush which a person who created an idea can give. Idea is something ? ?1?. But what a huge increase individual, who is impetus for innovation, and team, who is the main implementer, make ? ?10?.

"It is always an individual who is the impetus for innovation; the details may be worked out by a team, but true innovation results from the enterprise and unique perception of an individual." The amount of information to work out increases very quickly nowadays. Now to prepare any mechanical stuff hundreds or thousands people are working, each in his narrow filed. Today the team is highly important step on developing and realizing any idea but anyway it is not the rush which only individual can carry out. Instead of person who has a lot of ideas living in his mind the team is usually a group of people organized to solve particular problem. As more persons it counts more ideas in theirs heads are existing. The team has no one-way critical reasoning as people are thinking differently and every worker has own outlook to the discussed problem. Actually the task of a team is not to generate ideas but fulfill, develop and realize. However how good the idea is the team has been still on high demand. For instance, the idea of any manufacture could die a commercial death without team. One businessman who has owned cereal manufacture has an idea to add soy protein to the wheat that his factory uses. His decision was made according to statistic information that people who are eating soybeans have a lower cholesterol level comparing to people who are not eating soybeans at all. But his decision is full of empty parts which the team has to fulfill. First of all he needs experts in wheat manufacturing to know the proportion of possible soy protein supplement. Moreover the management team has to work on the idea. It needs to serf the market and search for manufactures who have already implemented the idea in life. The advertising departure should work seriously under the new product to show the society the real profit of it. Thus the idea is surely nothing without a team. Summarizing all, the idea created by individual and team have to coexist. Very little amount of inventors could implement ideas in life without team and surely the work area of an invention is minimal. Imagine that team is ?0? and idea is ?1?. Team is zero without a rush which a person who created an idea can give. Idea is something ? ?1?. But what a huge increase individual, who is impetus for innovation, and team, who is the main implementer, make ? ?10?.

As we acquire more knowledge, things do not become more comprehensible, but more complex and more mysterious. The fact is the more one knows in a subject the less one is sure in it. It is the universal truth that humanity meets during all its existence. People gather a huge amount of information of particular theme for ages and then face with complexity of the topic. Even it is state that the more information we get the more complex things are sometimes this fact doesn?t work. Earlier people believe that thunderstorm is a God anger. Then after hundreds years and a lot of discovering and experiments scientists found the causes and reasons of thunderstorms. Now the thunderstorm can be artificially produced. From the first sight the indicated nature action is comprehensible but a new type of thunderstorm, appeared in hot regions, was found and people find it creation and appearance very mysterious. The more knowledge has encouraged the complexity in anything. During the whole history of our civilization we may observe how the knowledge changed. From the first known civilization on the Earth to nowadays people study Astronomy. And the more information is gathered the more complex this science has become. Galileo Galilee couldn?t expect that his descendants found that the space has no borders. He was sure that there were the particular number of planets and stars in the space but the knowledge is growing, the technologies are improving thus the more stars and planets were found and scientists came to the solution that they are unable to border the space. We may compare our knowledge with circle in space. When new information comes the circle broadens and new elements of subject fulfill our mind and make our reasoning and decisions dependent on hundreds of things. For instance compare the process of friends choosing of young boy or girl with man or woman. The older people are more attentive while choosing person for communicating and friendship. The ages and skills show them characteristics they want or don?t want to see in their friends. Moreover people become able to determine these characteristics in other people. Youngsters operate less knowledge about human personality that is why teenagers has a lot of friends. The knowledge makes the things more complex even in friends choosing. Summarizing all, we may observe that the knowledge grows everyday and even minute. Humanity widens their package of information which favors in development of science and society. However the more knowledge we keep the more incomprehensible things are around us. BTW - great thanks to antelope for some ideas i use here.

thank you very much for your review. i found a lot of things useful for me and try to use them in my future essays. and some more i'm at aldaily.com now. Great thanks for extremely useful information.