|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
TestMagic Guru-in-Training
![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 671
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Fun with Econ: Would Steven Levitt get into MIT today?
We all keep trying to figure out what gets you into the top schools. So, to break some of the tension around here, I thought I'd throw out the question to see what kind of responses people have.
Profile: Harvard undergrad (summa cum laude), econ major Math courses: one calculus class, nothing else Honors: Young prize for best senior thesis in economics dept LOR: I'm guessing thesis advisor, probably two other well-known Harvard profs ***Levitt won an NSF, but I think he won it during his first year at MIT. (NSF Fellow '92-'94, and was awarded his PhD in '94. I'm pretty sure he finished his PhD in 3 years, but that means he entered in Fall '91, and won NSF the following spring... the point here being that an NSF Fellowship didn't help him get into MIT, since he was already there). About only having one calc course, that was mentioned in the JEP article announcing the Bates Clark Medal going to Levitt. So, what do you all think... would Steven Levitt get into MIT if he applied today? |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
TestMagic Guru-in-Training
![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 690
![]() ![]() |
I think its pretty fair to say that, holding their backgrounds constant, most economists would have a hard time getting into grad school these days. As applicants, we've got better information, and, IMHO, the applicant pool gets a little better and hence more competitive each year. So I'm going to say no on Levitt.
There's still the "you got it or you don't" factor. It can buy you an awful lot. Levitt's got 'it', though, no question.
_ _ _ _ SIG _ _ _ _
University of Wisconsin - Madison: Took my Masters and ran. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
TestMagic Guru-in-Training
![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 671
![]() ![]() ![]() |
I keep going back and forth on this one. While I think the connections may have gotten him in, I can't help but think the total lack of math background would have gotten him into the auto-reject pile, even before they read the recommendations. But, then again, maybe the Young prize was the signal that he had 'it'. My final answer is no, he wouldn't make it... and if he still would, then I know we'd all get depressed knowing that the investments we've made were overlooked in favor of a backdoor admission. (Not that I stood a chance of getting into top schools in the first place, but still...)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
Within my grasp!
![]() ![]() Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 133
![]() |
[quote=OneMoreEcon]
***Levitt won an NSF, but I think he won it during his first year at MIT. (NSF Fellow '92-'94, and was awarded his PhD in '94. I'm pretty sure he finished his PhD in 3 years, but that means he entered in Fall '91, and won NSF the following spring... the point here being that an NSF Fellowship didn't help him get into MIT, since he was already there). quote] He graduated from Harvard at 1989, he spent 5 years on PhD? http://pricetheory.uchicago.edu/levitt/LevittCV.html |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
TestMagic Guru-in-Training
![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 671
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Ross, his CV doesn't say when he started at MIT. I know we usually assume that people begin a PhD right after the BA, but I seem to recall reading that Levitt finished his PhD in three years. Also, if he was an NSF fellow from 92-94, he didn't hold the fellowship for three full academic years (92-93, 93-94, and maybe an extra semester). Since NSF is good for three years of study, it seems that he finished very quickly.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Contact TestMagic TestMagic Forums Archive Privacy Statement
TestMagic Locations
Legal
Privacy
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
Copyright © 2009 TestMagic
Ad Management by RedTyger