ps231 Posted July 17, 2008 Share Posted July 17, 2008 x is not equal to y. Is x-y / x+y > 1 ? (1) x > 0 (2) y IMO : B Explanation: Multiply both sides of the inequality by x+y x-y > x + y (1) Let x = 8 and y = 7 1 > 15 - Wrong let x = 8 and y = -7 15 > 1 - Correct Condition INSUFF (2) Let x = 8 and y = -7 15 > 1 - Correct let x = -8 and y = -7 -1 > -15 - Correct Hence SUFF. Hence B seems to be the correct answer to me. Need your views. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
getneonow Posted July 17, 2008 Share Posted July 17, 2008 Again you did the same mistake of cross multiplication without knowing the sign of denominator, (x+y) in this case. instead bring the R.H.S(right hand side) term to L.H.S and do your simplifications. i.e to verify x-y / x+y > 1 => To verify (x-y / x+y) - 1>0 =>To verify [(x-y)-(x+y)] / (x+y) > 0 =>To verify -2y/ (x+y) > 0 This has to be the simplified version of original equation rather than cross multiplying to get a equation which has taken things for granted. Now from here you can plug in options (1) and (2) and verify for yourself.:tup: ans will be E x is not equal to y. Is x-y / x+y > 1 ? (1) x > 0 (2) y IMO : B Explanation: Multiply both sides of the inequality by x+y x-y > x + y (1) Let x = 8 and y = 7 1 > 15 - Wrong let x = 8 and y = -7 15 > 1 - Correct Condition INSUFF (2) Let x = 8 and y = -7 15 > 1 - Correct let x = -8 and y = -7 -1 > -15 - Correct Hence SUFF. Hence B seems to be the correct answer to me. Need your views. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maychamp Posted July 17, 2008 Share Posted July 17, 2008 Plugging Values approach: 4 scenarios to consider: both +ive, Both -ive, one positive and one negative (ie x>0, y0) Within each scenario try x>y and x Statement 1 is insufficient because you get different results when you use any of the scenarios above Statment 2 is also insufficient because you get different results when you use any of the scenarios above Now Combine them i.e x>0 and y therefore 5-(-2)/5+(-2)= 7/3 now pick x,y i.e. x=2, y=-5 so you get 2+5/2-5= 7/-3 Seeing that we get two diff results, answer is E Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ps231 Posted July 18, 2008 Author Share Posted July 18, 2008 netneo, thanks a lot! You were able to pinpoint my mistake :) Hope i do not commit the same again! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fighter_79 Posted July 18, 2008 Share Posted July 18, 2008 Hi The question is Is (x -y)/(x+y)> i.e Is x>y? (using componendo-dividendo) So, if x>0 and y y. So I feel, the answer should be C. Please let me know the OA. Regards, Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
charry_008 Posted July 21, 2008 Share Posted July 21, 2008 Answer should clearly be C. If we consider both statements then numerator would clearly be greater than denominator for all cases. Hi The question is Is (x -y)/(x+y)> i.e Is x>y? (using componendo-dividendo) So, if x>0 and y y. So I feel, the answer should be C. Please let me know the OA. Regards, Can you please explain how you applied componendo dividendo to the above inequality. As far as i know, componendo dividendo means if a/b=c/d then (a+b)/(a-b)=(c+d)/(c-d) Am I missing something here? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trying_to_study Posted July 22, 2008 Share Posted July 22, 2008 Answer would be E. considering both statements... let x=5, y=-4, 5+4/(5-4) = 9/1 > 1 Now take x=3, y=-10 3+10/3-10 = negative number Thus st 1 and 2 combined insuff, hence E Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shsingh Posted July 22, 2008 Share Posted July 22, 2008 To me it is E Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.