Hey everyone , now I'm beginning to improve my writing skill , please leave your comment about my essay . It took me over an hour to write, revise and rewrite it neaty and clearly .
Knowledge is invaluable , and no one disagree about it . But when discussing which source of knowledge is better : books or experience , people are very different in opinion . Some consider books the better while ohter oppose that and praise experience .To have the right estimation about them , whe should analyse each one's weakness and strength .
Books do have some advantages over experience . Since they are cheap and easy to access , the knowledge from books spreads very quickly . Moreover , the information in books are well organized into directories , so it takes less time to fimnd what we want to discover.Books are also an effective tools to dieminate common knowledge because they are written very clealy and concisely .
However , the lack of reality is book's weakest points whereas it is experience' strongest . And if there's no reality , we study for nothing . But the problem when study through experience is that we will encounter a lot of failure to master the knowledge , and sometimes , the price we have to pay is very high , bot on material and spirit . However , because of its close contact with reality , we will remember the knowledge from experience longer than those from books .
Now it gets confusing . Each has its unique points , so which is the better one ? I think that both of them are equal since the strongests poitns of knowledge from books can suuport the eakest point in experience knowledge very well . In fact , we can reduce the risk of failure and the high price by reseaching carfully on books .Then , we apply to reality and learn through experience to remember longer . So , instead of arguing and try to disvalue one of them , by combining both , we can get the best result of our effort , isn't it a good thing ?