Rat

agree with D

What is the source of this question? I am curious.

Surprisingly OA is A. Source: GMATPrep

Ramya, I think it is discussed previously. Please do a search.

Q) As the former chair of the planning board for 18 consecutive years and a board memeber for 28 year, Joan Phikill attended more than 400 meetings and reviewed more than 700 rezoning applications. A) As the former B) The former C) Former D) She was E) As the Source: GMATPrep. I dont have OA. Let us finalize!!

I will go with E. them clearly refers to monastries

hitzs, Only 3 correct If structures: If she wins the lottery............. WILL + BASE VERB If she won the lottery.............. WOULD/COULD + BASE VERB If she had won the lottery..........WOULD/COULD + HAVE + PAST Participle Subjenctive Mood: If I were rich...................... WOULD/COULD + BASE VERB.

Dude, I am not able to see anything.:hmm:

I dont see anything in the doc. Am I browsing it wrong? EDITED: I am Sorry , I tried all options. I am not able to see the questions. I guess it is my mistake/mylaptop mistake.

A: "and" is not showing the contrast. I think "but" is required to show the contrast. Other than that I dont see any problem here. B: not as... but .. is not llell C: IMO D:Wrong comparison - Freud should be compared with many psychologists E:Wrong comparison - Freud should be compared with many psychologists

Another good one!!! what is the source? A: IMO B: "them" - no clear reference ."intent of others using them" is odd C: "them" - no clear reference billings/CC numbers D: "their use" - wrong E: "their" - no clear reference billings/CC numbers Any other views?

Good one , A: IMO: B: "to attend" and "to complain" are sound like future actions. C: Incorrect If structure "were" D: Incorrect If structure "were" E: Incorrect If structure "should" Correct me if I am wrong..

One more vote for A.

Dude, You already posted OAs. You could have waited for some more time.

A: IMO B: not relavant C: Irrlevant D: Irrlevant E: Irrlevant ____________________ Correct me if I am wrong.

Good one. A: B: 'it' - no reference. C: D: 'its ...members' prejudice' - is odd; had- is required to show the time difference. E: 'its support of' - 'its' - does not have clear reference. Though I left with A and C, I could not able to understand the difference between usage of 'where' and 'while'. In A, 'by supporting' is clear when compared with 'in support of' in C. Can anybody explain difference b/n while/where in this sentence?

A: "their" - wrong. B: chattering and flying are not two independent actions- "and" - not required. C: IMO D:chattering and flying are not two independent actions- "and" - not required. E: "they"- wrong. ----------------- correct me if I am wrong.

A: Didnt see any problem but C is better B: research...have -wrong C: IMO , not ... but is better D:research...have -wrong E:research...have -wrong correct me if I am wrong.

IMO: C Reason: each of these cars is good "is" is correct, coz it refers to a car But, They each ARE tennis players, " are" is correct, coz it refers to "they" SO C is right

A: reason/because redundant B: "it" - no reference C: "more... than" misplaced. D: IMO E: reason/because redundant

yeap C it is A: modifier problem B: modifier problem "had" not required C: IMO D: modifier problem E:modifier problem

I feel "like" is required since we are comparing nouns. I am struck between A and E. I vote for A. Can somebody explain why not 'E'

IMO: B A: "are' verb missing B: IMO C: "are' verb missing D: "are' verb missing E: "are' verb missing, "it" no reference

C it is. for 'D', we need past tense to support "had". Am I correct?

But I feel A better when compared to C. Shud, How come author is using "had" along with "has" ? Can you help me here?