Rajat_Singhal

Imo B

C it is! Explanation: The number of televisions sold in Borodia has not changed. Also, there is a drop in the number of television assemblers in Borodia. If C is not true, it is possible that the no. of televisions imported from Vernland has NOT changed. And the loss in the number of televisions assembled because of the decrease in the no. of assemblers in Borodia is made up by the increased efficiency of the assemblers who still remain in Borodia. So, if we say that the import has increased, we assume C,i.e.,that the efficiency of the assemblers in borodia has not increased! Hope it helps!

I ll go with A. Author's conclusion is : enzyme K contributes to improved performance in strenuous activities such as weightlifting and sprinting. 'E' just proves that enzyme K is present and is not produced by the strenuous activity. That doesnt mean that it improves the performance! whereas 'A' ensures that the improved performance is because of enzyme K! what is the OA?

Quote: I vote for E. I think only E is grammatically correct. a. they originally seemed to b. they originally seemed to c. they seemingly? would cost originally? d. it seemed originally that they would e. it originally seemed (that) they would (cost). This is a good start. For instance, B would need to be in past tense, seemed. In fact, I often teach GMAT and TOEFL students that the words original (and its derivations) and first usually require past tense. Furthermore, the "past future" of would in E is more precise than the simple past in A (or that B is lacking, in case you're going to ask if B would be correct if we changed seem to seemed). Since we're talking about something we'd learn after a certain point in the past, would is better. For example: This Acura is a lot better than I thought it would be.is better than This Acura is a lot better than I thought it was.In the first example, we are saying that something turned out to be true. In the second example, we are saying that we were not aware of a fact that was true at that time. And in the charter vacations question, there is no fact that the travelers were unaware of when they purchased the charter vacation--after the original purchase of the charter vacation (and probably toward the end of the vacation), the charter vacation turned out to be more costly than they had at first believed it would be. I understood that part. But can u plz clarify what is 'it' in choice E referring to? E) it originally seemed (that) they would (cost). what originally seemed they would???

hi, i think 'A' is ambiguous because it lacks...'a cannon that shoots' part.. 'A cannon shooting dead chickens at airplanes' can be interpreted as 1. Cannon that is shooting dead chickens at airplanes. (intended) 2. Dead chickens at airplanes that are shooting a cannon. (illogical but still!) It's just what i think. I go with E.

Animesh and G.Unit, If u look closely, u ll find that the conclusion is the first line of the para. This country does not need any more restrictions on pollution. 'A' is just an explanation for the dramatic statistics. It's not against author's conclusion.It is kind of supporting! Hence, D.