ajay_deepak

I will go with B. A, D and E can be eliminated easily. Nothing has been said about quantity of materials used, so nothing can be said about C.

A and E, aren't they same? What is the OA?

I will go with A. Except the first sentence all other sentences give reasons to justify why the universities should not be entitled to own patents. So the first sentence should be a conclusion.

Criticism is middle class elderly people representing the demands of economically disadvantaged elders. To substantiate we need something which can support this criticism and say that only the middle-class are active to join. I will go with D

I will go with B. While they ask for fiscal independence they demand familial dependence on morality issues.

I will go with B.

D for me. Whats the OA?

@buskool But no where it is stated that chicken are immune to the virus.

D is extreme with "only". I will go with B

A. Doesn't matter where the amino acid is present or produced. B. May be decline in other amino acids can allow the herb to grow. This actually weakens. D. This in fact helps the herb to adapt and thus no need of amino acid. E. After some time the metals become inert because of excessive amino acid. Once metal becomes inert then no further need of amino acid. This strengthens. C. This tells that others too grow because of high amino acid production and this strengthens in a better way. I will go with C. E, though strengthens, but raises a lot of questions.

I will go with B. If the chicken is killed within its first year then one can never know if it had any disease. What is the OA and the explanation?

I will go with A. One party says the litigations are unnecessarily high whereas other party counters it saying the number of successes is same. So to weaken it we have to say that even though the number of successes is same there are many litigations which have been unsuccessful thus being expensive to the businesses.

B for me.

I will go with B.

I will go with B. Because of Proposition 13 they are paying around $1000 and $2000 respectively, otherwise they will be paying $6000.

I will go with B. Less local news by DC, so less of "real voice". However I guess many will say owned by out-of-town hence not "real voice" so to counter it we need a statement telling governed by locals hence the "real voice". But does governing by local people ensure more issues about the place?

I too want to go with D, but the terms 'growing' and 'expanding' create confusion. Err...may be am thinking too much.

I will go with E

I will go with A

IMO C A. if not effective then no one will buy. B. Better brands in market then reduction in market share. C. Withdrawn from sale because did not find many takers. So the cost to manufacture is hardly an issue. D. If consumers did reject it then reduction in market share. E. Same as D

E. What is the OA?

1. B 2. C

IMO C D considers all homeless = all rich. But a few of them go uncounted and not all.

Imo E

IMO A A can be inferred from the second statement but I think "all" is an extreme word. B puts charges on the chairman and that is not the case. C May be or may not be. Only chairman claims so. D I feel growing and expanding are different. E Acquittal is strong term, what if his case is still doing round and he has not been charged yet.