faust

1. According to Booker T. Whatley’s recent analysis, planting the same crops as are planted on large farms will lead to economic disaster for the small farmer, who should plan a succession of high-value crops that will provide a year-round cash flow. (A) planting the same crops as are planted on large farms will lead to economic disaster for the small farmer, who (B) it will lead to economic disaster for the small farmer to plant the same crops as on the large farms; they © economic disaster will result from planting the same crops as large farms to the small farmer, who (D) economic disaster for the small farmer will result from planting the same crops as on the large farms; they (E) the small farmer planting the same crops as are planted on large farms will lead to economic disaster; they OA is A I have provided the official answer. However, I would greatly appreciate if some of you guys out there provide meaningful attemp along with your explanation. Thank you

The answer is 3, two things went wrong, one is parallelism and second is incorrect comparison. It should be; Less of a commitment to work and a career than. 2 is wrong because you want to compare commeitment not parents

Answer A. (

Same as everyone else, my answer is A. -9, 10, -11, 12, -13, 14, -15, 16, -17, 18 row 1 -19, 20, -21, 22, -23, 24, -25, 26, -27, 28 row 2 hence, the 46th term is 44, and the sum of row 1 is 5, and 5 * 10 gives me 50. Col A = 50, Col B =44

Given A = {6, 6, 9,10,14,15} B = {7, 9,10,11,14, 15} Col A: Standard deviation of A Col B: Standard deviation in B Ans A. Between Set A and Set B, Set A has a larger Range 15 - 6 = 9 VS. 15 - 7 = 8

MGMAT is fairly accurate, my range was between 640 to 600. After MGMAT My first attempt was 500 Q44 V12 My second attempt was 620 Q44 V31

a.) took 700,000 artisans more than 36 years to complete them - Issue here is them is referring to pyramids and ancient cities, but Army is singular. b.) took 700,000 artisans more than 36 years to complete it - it could refer to China’s first emperor or Army c.) took 700,000 artisans more than 36 years to complete d.) 700,000 artisans took more than 36 years to complete e.) to complete them too 700,000 artisans more than 36 years - Same as A

IMO E - I pick E because it has a cleaner structure then B I would eliminated C and D for it has no clear antecednet; dosage or treatment C as, for example, having too low of a dosage of prescribed drug for it to be effective, or being D when they have, for example, been prescribed too low a drug dosage for it to be effective, or were A and B are wordy - "prescribed a drug as a dosage too low"

It's between C and D, IMO I pick C, although we have lunar volcanoes and Tektites, they is a subject pronouns and Tektites is the only subject in the sentence enhence, I do see anything ambiguity. (A) is different than any terrestrial lava; they contain - incorrect comparison composition vs that of terrestrial lava, not terrestrial lava (B) is different than any terrestrial lava’s, containing - idiom, it's either different from or differ from © is different from that of any terrestrial lava; they contain (D) differs from any terrestrial lava in containing (E) differs from that of any terrestrial lava’s, containing - redundant

IMO D I eliminated A, C and E applying same logic as abhishek7749. but without for, it seems like what's Bake trys to make up??

IMO B, and here is my reason, E is incorrect because it changes the intended meaning, the corridor doesn't transmitted cultural influences, but it allows cultural influences to transmitted from one place to another. As Quiver stated, Corridor is a pillor, a thing, so off the bat A and C are eliminated. Where is for location. D conveys the same meaning as E, it just construct differently.

IMO E A and B are eliminated because "protecting the public" can modify either By Law or "a qualified physician ...", if it were protected or protects instead of protecting, then B could be the answer. "Which" is actually for non-restrictive clause, "that" is for restrictive clause. C is incorrect because which is modifying mecdicine instead. But the sentence try to convey Law protects to people. Lastly we have D and E, "only" should be directly in front of the noun you want to modify, in this case Physcian.

As indicated, you did the first spilt because of passive structure, hence E is eliminated. So how did A, B and C get eliminated by the passive structure. Here my second question regarding the OA, Language variation originating from ethnic and cultural heritages; it's indiciates that Language variation happened in the pass and is still happening. However, perpetuated by geographic isolation, so are we no longer being seperated? Language Variation occur due to two factors, but If D is right, then pretty much one is still happening and the other is not. In addition, is this a safe assumption that it's passive or it couldn't be past tense.

IMO E, If Columnist clams George's book is influencial, but what if those people never read them, it makes the calm faulty

No, it would be incorrect if you use "HE", since his (possesive pronoun) to refer to Diderot's (possession) factual, there is no issue here.

I actually think D is the answer, If I have to choose between A and D. If I understand this correctly, D) compare A to B is like compare C to D where as A) compare A to B is compare C to D. E is out for reason KillGMAT has stated. B and C are out because of To compare...Comparing and Comparing...To compare, it lacks ||

IMO E, to keep parallelism taking ... are transitioning

Contestants in many sports prepare for competition by eating pasta as part of a "carbohydrate-loading " regimen that is supposed to provide quick energy. (A) prepare for competition by eating pasta as (B) prepare for competition and eat pasta, which is © prepare for competition by eating pasta because this is (D) eat pasta to prepare for competing, which is (E) eat pasta to prepare for competing as Will provide OA later, Respond with clear explanation why and how each answer is eliminated. Please be mindful and help others in this forum. No one liner such as IMO or No doubt it's x

Sourav, here is a question for you, I find out that the sentence after semicolon needs to be independence clause. But what's the reason you use to eliminate E and not A

IMO D is the answer. A. enabling mushrooms to flourish. - it needs a verb, enabling is a noun. B. for the mushrooms to flourish. - for is not the right usage,for is similar to because, the meaning is not right. C. for flourishing mushrooms. - same as B D. that enable the mushrooms to flourish. that IMO is correct because it's a restrictive clause, it's the humus that allow mushrooms to grow, and that is modifying humus. E. that the mushrooms can flourish

Thanks @@Test Taker for explanation, but you guys still havn't answer why whose is the correct word of choice.

My selections are between B and C, I though B is incorrect because whose can only be use to replace a person. In addition, grammatically speaking what's wrong with C

The capital of Bosnia-Herzegovina, Sarajevo's population on the eve of the First World War was 51,919. (A) Bosnia-Herzegovina, Sarajevo's population (B) Bosnia-Herzegovina is Sarajevo, whose population © Bosnia-Herzegovina is Sarajevo, with a population (D) Bosnia-Herzegovina, Sarajevo having a population that (E) Bosnia-Herzegovina, the population of Sarajevo Spoiler QA : B Respond with clear explanation and be helpful to others in this forum. not being able to explain is not better than guessing.

I have two questions regarding this question. Firstly, I choose D to be my answer, grammatically speaking why can't I start a sentence with "to tax". Secondly, why is its merits correct, what is its referring to.

According to some analysts, whatever its merits, the proposal to tax away all capital gains on short-term investments would, if enacted, have a disastrous effect on Wall Street trading and employment. (A) its merits, the proposal to tax (B) its merits may be, the proposal of taxing © its merits as a proposal, taxing (D) the proposal's merits, to tax (E) the proposal's merits are, taxing SPOILER QA : A Respond with clear explanation, be helpful to others and no one liner such as IMO or no doubt it's x, if you can't explain, it's no better than guessing.