venkpeters

I already searched but i couldnt understand the explanations... My doubt is that undated document could have been written after 1765 too, then whey C is the answer? someone pl solve this puzzle

My pick is A, Dispute over is the correct idiom

Pls give your explanation, dont give your IMO alone, i have the OA without explanation with me. Thanks.

IMO its D, D maintains parallism

In the course of her researches, a historian recently found two documents mentioning the same person, Erich Schnitzler. One, dated May 3, 1739, is a record of Schnitzler’s arrest for peddling without a license. The second, undated, is a statement by Schnitzler asserting that he has been peddling off and on for 20 years. The facts above best support which of the following conclusions? (A) Schnitzler started peddling around 1719. (B) Schnitzler was arrested repeatedly for peddling. © The undated document was written before 1765. (D) The arrest record was written after the undated document. (E) The arrest record provides better evidence that Schnitzler peddled than does the undated document. this question is stunning..

IMO the ans should be E, X can be any value, for ex 3 or 5

Another vote for D

Another vote for A

IMO its between C and D, i am more inclined towards C, i think E is wrong, because the stimulus clearly says "for anyone with retirement needs similar to theirs. " and its not for everyone.

My pick is also B, the gist of the passage is clearly stated in B

Hi adi could you please tell me where you can get the latest manhattan sc guide for Rs.250, i am also interested in purchasing..

whats wrong with d, D is concise too..

Very useful indeed.

My pick is B The conclusion is "if the warming continues, the guillemots' range will probably be enlarged by being extended northward along the coast.", D says If the Arctic warming continues, much of the thin ice in the southern Arctic will disappea, so it doesnt hamper the conclusion, B says If the Arctic warming continues, guillemots' current prefators are likely to succeed in extending their own range farther north, therefore if the predators expand obviously the conclusion willl be challenged..

IMO generally bonds yield a fixed percent of interest, its not like shares where there is a possiblity of loss too so here intrest is + ve for sure.. If my view is true C would be ans... I got the following meaning in the dictionary for BOND "A certificate of debt (usually interest-bearing or discounted) that is issued by a government or corporation in order to raise money; the issuer is required to pay a fixed sum annually until maturity and then a fixed sum to repay the principal"

But i believe less/fewer should refer to the pollutants ? which is a countable quantity, so answer should be D.. Whats your opinion on this..

IMO its A

Its obviously D..

1. IMO its B, Aim at usually takes a noun object as in: aim at a target. And this question is not testing the subjuntive mood, you can replace to with if and check this, if you want to succeed..... 2. As elnino said no sooner than is the right idiom, not "no sooner when", so A, E and B out, for example "No sooner had she come than the maid knocked". "I had no sooner left than she called", Apart from that this question uses negative inversion too..

Consider there are 100 accident victims surveyed and ALL are severly injured (worst case scenario). Then there are 80 severly injured accident victims not wearing seatbelts, then the percent wearing seatbelts is 20/100 So, if not all of the accident victims are severly injured, the percent wearing seatbelts should be more than 20/100, in order to support the conclusion.

My pick is A

its very easy one IMO its B

Could some one explain the diff between "taking" and "Take" wrt to this sentence.

I believe its very much logical to assume that Large cities will definitely will have more population, so the answer should be E The meaning of city as given in the dictionary is "A large and densely populated urban area" so E is an obvious answer.

My pick is D