ragram

Hi All, I will be taking my TOEFL in another two weeks. Can you guys suggest me from where to start the preparation so that i can handle it comfortably. thanks, Raghu

1) Old man is not accused of his stinting (limited; only small amount) affection ; his conduct is adoration (excessive love) of her 2) Chemist believes that nomenclature is imprecise (not clear) which combines the concept instead of keeping it as discrete (separate) Hope this helps, thanks

Well, finally I too got the chance to write about by score. It just got over couple of hours ago. Great experience, though am not very much happy about my score its a bit good score. I will write a detailed report about my experience later.

There should be some mistake in the question. It should be "venerable", if that be the case then option A Venerable thing is suitable for Respect Exemplary thing is suitable for Imitation. And option 4 seems to be a analogy trap. If it is "ostentatious" then it is something suitable for Attention. "Ostensible" is different from "ostentatious" correct me if am wrong. thanks.

How it is possible to rule out 2 such easily ? Subtraction of any 5 digit number to its reflection has to be an even number. So it is divisible by 2 right ! And so how can you eliminate 4 and 6 also ?

What is that its mentioned in the rules ? U.S Addresses only. I don't have one yet : ) But still i like this T. Shirt. Would be lucky if i get one. Luck plays major role in one's life. Having my exam in couple of days. Believing my luck there also. thanks.

I think the answer should be B) We will GRIPE in Discontent We will Praise in Admiration. Correct me if am wrong.

Can anyone make a bridge ? Emollient: soothe a) dynamo: generate b) elevation: level c) precipitation: fall d) hurricane: track e) negative: expose answer with explanation !

If X is divided by 2, 4, 6 and 8, the remainder is 1. What is X ? Column A : X Column B : 24 Answer with explanation. thanks.

It should be A. Column A is bigger. What is the official answer ?

YourHarry, First paragraph is too elaborate as a introduction and it would have been better if it is reduced by highlighting your stand on the issue alone with few sentence that support your stand. First example is good but it seems quite bizarre to have rocks to the invention of fire by primitive man. I think in the world where fire is treated as invention, stones are not commonplace things. If the idea of fire strikes my mind for this analysis, i would have used the fire as hackneyed thing and would have described bout fire balloons. Second example is ok, but i don't understand the hackneyed thing used here and the corresponding invention. It is clear that Mendel's ingenuity made him to related the genes of plea with its filial generation when compared to others who tried to breed the same has scintillated with the patter of their genes. The qualified agreement with the false notion mentioned in the third paragraph is good, in the period where computers where not used everywhere Gates invention of Operating System as changed the technology world upside down and towards its growth. Conclusion is very good. Though common things lies beneath most of the invention, it is not the thing that is considered it is the passion on those things which leads to successful invention. This point is clearly mentioned. On the whole my rating for your essay is 4.5 . Am not a good writer but am trying to improve. Kindly apologize me if i was harsh in rating your essay. All the very best.

The essay you have presented definitely deserves 5+ or even 6. The introduction and conclusion is very clear. Examples are cogent and fits the context perfectly. But I found it difficult to read the last but one paragraph of your essay. Am not sure if it is my inefficiency or it is not expressed clearly. thanks

These are my answers D, C, B, A, A, E, E Explanation for question 7: Opinions of Li's are coincided with Chuang, so the opinion _ the exception ? Exception, which suggested by critic's has not influenced general public. Hope this helps. Correct me if am wrong. thanks.

Yes, egalitarian is a word that takes this sentence. Also other choices makes a completely different meaning either in the first blank or second. thanks.

Its just my doubt, how could it be possible to call it as "reproduction" for atoms producing different molecules. If you avoid that probably you can choose the right one I guess.