dokiente

Many thanks your opinion, it is reasonable. However, I found the use of "be compared with" in all of my dictionaries I have -Oxford, Macmilan, Cambridge - and none of which has an example as your opinion. Might you give me the material proving your opinion is true?

Realtive humidity is the amount of water vapor the air contains at a certain temperature ..... with the amount it could hold at that temperature A) to compare B) compared C) comparing D) compares The answer is B. However, I cannot explain why B is correct ? In my opinion, a structure of this sentence is: S + V + O(that) S+ V + compared with + N (that) S + V. If "compared with ...." is a reduced phrase, I think it cannot locate in this position. Please tell me your opinion! Many thanks.

1) I think use b) is correct because : Clause1, also clause2 (,) and clause3. ...if you try to eleminate "also", my idea, it is still correct. 2) In the book "Right Word Wrong Word" : -no one : no person -none : no person; no thing so that using none in this sentence is more correct than is using "no one". (none > "no one") 3)As far as I know, everything can be, but ,in formal, d) is better than b) .... I am feeeeeling as Renata say :) 4)I do not know why "as" used in this sentence is correct. In the book "Right Word Wrong Word": a word "most" is explained below: -most+ noun : using for indefinite meaning. -most of + the: using for definite meaning.

I think I find the response: "two years" here is a sort of determiner, not an adjective. In above sentence, it is put a parallel structure not only - but also. Determiner consists of 3 types : 1. article ; 2. possessive ; 3. demonstrative (e.g no, each, many, ...)

3. Bison, which were once nearly extinct, are a comeback- for which credit goes to ranchers and conservationists working together. ...B is incorrect but I feel this sentence is not normal.

1)Employers often require that candidates have not only a degree_______ a)but two years experience b)also two years experience c)but also two years experience d)but more two years experience c)is correct but...as far as I know: the second year = year two. two years of experience = two-year experience. today I see: "two years experience", it is true?? If that is true, I can write : two times jump (Eg: In the olympic games, he get a gold medal only after two times jump.). Please check for me! Thanks in advance.

Thank Vaya, Chaiyachoti and all read my question. I see what you want to say. I'll try to feel the language, not to count it...and in future I will be a Guru! :D See you soon.

...I am sorry Atnoon and all! Between "tenor voice" and "as" there is one space!!! Next times I will be more careful.( I really put one space between them but perhaps I must put two or more spaces between them :() When I post this sentence, I want discuss whether,to find the paralell structures in a sentence, one must understand completely the meaning of it. We have (from Cliff) S + V + the same +(noun)+ as + Noun1/Pronoun. From above pattern, I rewrite S+V+noun. Noun1+V+noun Evidently, function of S and funtion of Noun1 is the same. Thereby if I have S+V+noun. Noun1+V+noun. Noun2+V+noun I rewite S+V+the same+noun+as + Noun1 and S+V+the same+noun+as + Noun2 = S+V+the same+noun+as + Noun1 and Noun2 Now, let's examine the following sentence: A well-trained falsetto voice stands in the same relationship to a tenor voice as the recorder and the flute. I have S="falsetto voice"; Noun1="recorder" Noun2="flute" noun="relationship" ...and this sentence is not wrong!!! D still is "and". But if I understand the meaning of it, I say D must be "to". Please tell me, my fault is what ???

A well-trained falsetto voice stands in the same relationship to a tenor voice as the recorder and the flute. Which one is wrong? My idea, if you do not understand the meaning of a sentence, you cannot see parallel structures.

Hi Dokiente, Let me try to explain your doubt. As you understand, it is correct to put a comma before a conjunction in the compound sentence. Conjunctions for compound sentences are as follows. [/size]f[/size]or [/size]a[/size]nd [/size]n[/size]or [/size]b[/size]ut [/size]o[/size]r [/size]y[/size]et [/size]s[/size]o These conjunctions are called "FANBOYS" in order to easy to memorize. There are only seven conjunctions in the compound sentence. On the other hand, "provided" is a conjunction for the complex sentence. It acts like "if" in the condition sentence, so when it stands between two clauses, we don't need to put a comma before it. Example : If I were you, I would buy a new car. I would buy a new car if I were you. HTH Thank chaiyachoti! I will remember FANBOYS

Dear ErinBilly, you are really TestMagic. I found the answer for this question in all books I have, but I cannot. It is my consuming all days until I read your message. Thank you very much. ... about comma. As far as I know comma must be put before conjunction - in the compound sentence, why in this sentence there is not any comma??

...I wonder "provided" is conjunction, and open my dictionary ... it is truth!!![^] Thank harbinger, bless u!

...I checked, there is no typo.

1) ______ famers extra hours of light by which to harvest crops before frost and winter come. a) The harvest moon b) Whenever the harvest moon allows c) During the harvest moon d) The harvest moon gives d) is ok. Please explain to me the function of which in this sentence. 2) _____ perceives the color black provided there is complete lack of stimulation of the retina. a) When a person b) A person will c) If a person d) A person d) is OK. In this sentence, it may be lack of comma??

Thank atnoon and chaiyachoti, I will read a lot about conjunction. Pleas wait my new questions :)!