PROFILE:
Type of Undergrad: UK Distance Econ programme
Undergrad GPA: Second Upper Honours
Type of Grad: Singapore Top 3 Econ programme
Grad GPA: 3.59/4 at time of application, improved since
GRE: 162Q, 161V, 4.0AW
Math Courses: Stats I&II, Maths I&II
Econ Courses: UG: Intro & Intermediate Micro, Macro, Metrics; Grad: Micro, Macro, Metrics, advanced macrometrics, macro, IO, applied micro, mechanism design
Other Courses: NIL
Letters of Recommendation: one Prof who grad from Yale (RA'ed for him), one Prof from Michigan (multiple published papers but retired), one Visiting Professor (retired from IMF), one Academic Visitor (supervised me in thinktank, from ECB)
Research Experience: RAed for thinktank, RAed for Uni project with report coming out; could possibly call some of my industry work vaguely research related
Teaching Experience: none
Research Interests: micro theory, behavioural, IO
SOP: stayed down to the facts: explained course system and contents, and described contents of research projects
Other: nothing
RESULTS:
Acceptances: George Washington University (funding declined), Singapore Management University (attending)
Waitlists: NA
Rejections: Michigan-Ann Arbor, Duke, Syracuse, Carneige Mellon, Washington-Seattle, Vanderbilt, American, Michigan State
Pending: Claremont Graduate University
Attending: Singapore Management University
Comments: my results are worse than a classmate's, and for his efforts, he got into RAND's waitlist, so with this result I can't complain too much. I likely would reapply this year too.
What would you have done differently? Do better in GRE and work harder in Masters than to spend time on applications.