calm_J

hi dear bull, thanks for your comment. I really appreciate it alot. Now i've learnt about 600 words and it's just working fine for me. (my memory is not very good but my technique is still workin fine)

wowwwwwww, a lot of thanks. (thanks)^99999999999999999 unfortunately what you say is very hard to me because of the native :( doesn't help very much. although i'll try to make use of what u say as well as possible. please rate my others. for the file it's still not working please send it to this mail calm_j@hotmail.com for vik. files i already downloaded them thanks alot. just curious, what's your area of interest, how did you learn to analyze any passage or argument like that? how long did it take you to do so? any help would be appreciated

nooooooo you missunderstood me .... maybe the point was not clear. :( what i meat is people (buying houses not selling houses) who are working full time .... will not be able to go and see houses for sale ( offered by any firm) in the morning because they are not free. Instead, they will go and see houses ( to buy) offered by (any firm) in eveninigs.... so agents working part time will be available to meet the needs of those people who are working full time. I hope this clarifies the point :( thanks for the .5 increase in my score. I also felt that this one and No. 3 also will be slightly different from No. 1,2 please rate the last one

hi awhig, thanks for viewing my essay please if there are any mistakes tell me. and if i've advanced a little more bit than my earlier ones please tell me. concerning point two there i mean people who works full time will not be able to see homes for sale in that time so they are not available in the mornings whereas they are available in evenings so agents working at that time gives more flexibility to those people i hope this is clear now. please rate. and thanks alot post me yours and i'll try to rate

hi guys, I've just started to use PP now. I think my version is old. when i click (about) in the help i got this version 3.1.525 V.1.09 and here is a picture of it .... any suggestions or any new version please specify link or upload it here. thanks in advance

hi bullfighter, really i'm impressed .... well done indeed. could you please identify the eqn for ques. 1 and tell me why it's 56*x not (56-50)*x

hi bullfighter, i have just got your message let's see if i really have a mistake u know that the right triangle is (hypotenuse)^2= (leg1^2)+(leg2)^2 then 13^2= h^2+(1/2b)^2....... well then i'm wrong in not in the law by itself but maybe i solved it in a rush so 13 = sqrt (h^2+1/4 (b)^2) u can continue now i think it's clear thanks for reminding me and for your message. I hope this could help. I'll wait for any comments or more explanation if you want

please Kindly rate my essays. thanks alot. I post topics with sequence presented by Erin Billy on the topic list. _______________________________________________________________ The following was posted on an Internet real estate discussion site. "Of the two leading real estate firms in our town—Adams Realty and Fitch Realty—Adams is clearly superior. Adams has 40 real estate agents. In contrast, Fitch has 25, many of whom work only part-time. Moreover, Adams' revenue last year was twice as high as that of Fitch, and included home sales that averaged $168,000, compared to Fitch's $144,000. Homes listed with Adams sell faster as well: ten years ago, I listed my home with Fitch and it took more than four months to sell; last year, when I sold another home, I listed it with Adams, and it took only one month. Thus, if you want to sell your home quickly and at a good price, you should use Adams." The writer article, at first look, sounds to be comparing the two real estate firms. However, with a deeper look it maybe just an advertising campaign for Adams. The evidence provided are weak, fails to convince the reader, and do not promote the superiority of Adams. First of all, the writer says that the number of agents who are working for Adams are more than those of Fitch. Although the evidence provided as home sales revenue does not support this idea. If the total revenue of Adams is double of that of Fitch then the home sales as well have to be at least nearly double that of Fitch. Also, for comparing the success, not only the total revenue is used but also we can use the average revenue by each agent. This kind of measure gives a right evidence of success. Also, there are factors like taxes and mortgage interest that affects the total revenue which are not specified as evidence for both firms. Another point, Fitch has twenty five agents and many of them are working part time. This gives two evidence that contradicts with the evidence provided by the article’s writer. Agents working part time can be available for customers who are free only in evenings. This gives more flexibility in making deals. The other evidence, if agents of Fitch is working part time and their number is less than those of Adams; they can still make revenue of house sales slightly fewer than that of Adams, which is totally contradicting with the writer evidences. The writer also relies on a weak point. The evidence proposed is outdated. That is he offered his house with Fitch ten years ago and it took them four months to sell whereas last year he did the same with Adams and it took them only one month. In this, there maybe many other factors that affected the selling of the house such as: the location of the house, its condition, price, facilities near it, the desire and demand of customers, luck, the number of inhabitants in that area, and safety. Also, if assumed for a moment that the writer evidence is strong, in the ten years period Fitch might have developed techniques for selling more rapidly at higher prices. As a conclusion, the article evidences contradicts with the idea the writer wishes to convince the reader with it. Evidences are weak; article fails to achieve its target. He should provide more evidence and verdict judgment on both firms.

Yeahhh Bullfighter, S= Perimeter/2

hiii sabna, it's not confusing at all if u applied b = 10 the RHS= LHS in the quadratic eqn if u applied b = 24 it will NOTTTTTTTT apply for LHS = RHS

answer 1-b if u know nothing get 2 No. between 1 & 2 multiply them and add them do it again 3 times to check if u know what no. means addition of 1.xxxx + 1.yyyy= 2.zzzzz or maybe 3.zzzzz but 1.xxxx*1.yyyy = 1.zzzzzzz answer 2-b u can find it by comparing only the den. because the num. are the same so the den. of b is less then the den. of a then b> a answer 3-c bullfighter .... best expanation answer 4-a bullfighter ..... best expanation

aslo there is another fast solution but i didn't check it there is a right triangle of 13-12-5 then b = 24 or b = 10 apply this in the both eqn's given above to see what b =10

hi a=60 then 1/2 b h = 60 then bh = 120 another relation for b, h use the right triangle pythagorian therom 13^2 = sprt ((1/4b)^2 + h^2) two eqn with two variables solve these two eqn u can get b , h also i want to remind u that b

ohhh ooopppsss i missed to multiply 10* sqrt(2) this means 14.1 whch gives 10 No.

For no. one imagine you have seven bills Each bill is of 1 dollar Now you are with these three people and will distribute the bills to them What will u do? You will give each one 1 bill Then you will have 4 bills remaining Again distribute these 4 bills You will have only one remaining You will give it to any one remaining So now at least one has 3 dollars And at the same time it’s the way you can distribute the bills Even No. are 2 ,4 ,6, 8 So which no. its sum can be 8 8 alone 2,6 Nothing else This means you have only 2 choices And you have four No. Then it’s 2/4 = ½