ravin

Crux of the argument: low number of articles was due to the decline in availability of particle accelerators. The best way to counter to counter is to show that the number of articles came down not because of the lack of availability of particle acccelerators but some oterh reason. E does that.

So that shud increase the pollutants .. right??? But in the stem there was a decrease.. So this option doesnot explain the trend.. What say?

Those are good ones... I got banged... Hoping for some good explanations..

A it is...

'instead of' is not to be used here .. so that rules out B/C Rest is parallelism leading to E

First Rule: 'Consider(ed) as' is not the correct idiom So this rules out A/D B gives the meaning that brown rice is not available E is funny in saying that most Japanese are unavaiable outside Yokohama Leaves us with C.

Gmat168, IMO B is wrong as it doesnot matter if they used it/not. That is outside the premise.. BUt it very well explains the problem which then rules out..as we are looking for least explaining choice What say?

I go with A.. Publishers are at discomfort leadign to fewer publishers.. What say??

i wud go for D. Malegria, Please try to fill in the OA . There are many open threads from u..

A .. OA Pls

A for me tooo. OA Pls !!

A for me OA Pls!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Shud be A.. Any reasons why the OA is D????

B & A for me.. OA Pls

OA here: C A A D