kingKHAN

I agree with the speaker's claim the it is dangerous to trust only intelligence.Being intelligent is not the sole criteria that indicates the particular human being can be trusted. Trust is related to the belief one has on another and has nothing to do with the level of intelligence. There are many cases in which instead of being beneficial these people are harmful for society.Had it been the case then people Fisrt example to buttress my claim is related to understanding human emotions. Many intelligent people are not able to comprehend the human feelings and fail in dealing with it. There are many cases where the most intelligent judges take wrong decision and many had to suffer. In the same context are human relationships. Had intelligence being the sole criteria to trust then people would have married to only intelligent people and we would have no cases of divorce . Whereas trust in a relationship is not determined by the how brilliant one is but well we understand one-anothers feelings. Another example to support my claim is that of a brilliant student who joins new company . Even if the student is academically intelligent it does not mean that he/she should be made the CEO of the company. Experience plays a key role in handling matters at high level. The student might be having best brains but still the testing,marketing of the product that are the very significant stages can't be left to immature student. There are times when people become infidel which is not in any case related to their intelligence level. Many a times due to monetary reasons some of most venered scientists , defense personnel sell out their secret plans or blueprints to make bombs. For example scientist A.Q. Khan was one of the most repected and intelligent scientist of Pakistan but still he sold the some atomic bomb related blueprints to Iran. This bolsters may claim that only being intelligent can be taken as sole criteria to trust. Also, it has found out the terrorists who are invovled in making bombs are very intelligent but still they they are the people to trust upon. On the other hand one can say that to carry out researches we need best brains. In areas where human lives are at risk one need to have specialists on whom we can rely . Some argue that people responsible for matters related to health, security should be best in that field . But , in such cases I would say that every human is liable to error and intelligent peole are no exception. Revered scientists at presitgious institution like NASA do make sometimes miscalculate which leads to disasters like Appolo 13 . They also sometimes fails to provide full proof plans where as they are among the top brains of the world. To sum up, I would suggets that the judging a person only on the basis of his/her intelligence can be dangerous. There are numbe rof examples which I have cited in my essay that prove that even the best brains can be harmful to the society. Many other factors such as experience, past record, emotion etc... play very crucial role.

did u apply any particular logic...please explain and was the median data given to confuse???

I have found two unusual questions in PP .please see them and explain the anwsers they are in word attachment ques.doc

dasquert could you please explain me the difference between the two question. i understood your solution in the thread link(question related to jar) you provided..but why can't it be applied on the marble question

appply ur formula on this: A jar contains 4 Red , 6 Whilte and 10 Blue marbles..If you remove marbles one at a time randomly . what is the minimum number that must be removed to be certain that you have at least 2 of each color ? A. 6 B. 20 C. 12 D. 16 E. 18

is anwser 16??? plz correct me...

simple 4^5 as each prize can be given to any four

thanks all of u

please confirm these concepts - zero is neither evn nor odd -1 is composite number -squre root of number -we take only positve root - if given x^2=9 the x=+3,x=-3 plz confirm my gre on monday

how is sibilant related to hiss???

TOPIC: Is media responsible for the increasing violence in society, especially in children ANALYSIS I oppose the speaker's claim that increasing violence in the media is the root cause of the violence in society. Firstly, the current pandemic media was not a part of the society few decades back or atleast not in the earlier centuries. Secondly, media does not create violence on its own it is only the mirror of society. Moreover, the media can't be the sole reason behind the augment in crime rate amongst young generation. The speaker claims that the media is responsible for the crimes is unjustified. It can be proven unwarrented if we read the history of any civilization. In the past times we didn't have the various forms of media that are present these days, but still the history is replete with many events of gory murders. For example, the genocide commited by Hitler on Jews community is black spot on humanity. Presenting the same case are the crimes commited by the British in their colonies which in turn instigated freedom fighters like Bhagat Singh,of India to take revenge by commiting violence against them. Media is the mirror of the society it reflects both the pleasant and horrible facets of the society . There are many teleflims being made on the crimes being commited on the women in the society. These flims make us realize some harsh realities and urge us to avoid the prevailing violence. This has lead to poeple forming many groups to help out those tortured women. Watching these goads the society to raise its voice and stop the violence. Similar case can be shown by presenting the example of Animal Planet. On this channel there are many programmes depicting the violene of humans against the animals. These shows do not prolifgrate the attacks but make us realize the pain of the animals. After watching these kind of showsthe perpretrators do give a second thought to the crimes they have done in past. On the other hand, some form of media like that the video games which are very popular among the childern incite them to commit crimes. It has been proved by various studies that the violent scenes that children watch on the television have drastic impacts on the psychology of children. In many cases, childern try to imitate the violent action scenes they see in the films. But it is not media which is responsible for this, instead it is the lack of proper parent control. Movies containing violent scenes do carry statuatory warning for certain age groups but still due to lack of proper control children see those films. To sum up, I will conclude that the media is not responsible for the prevailing violence in the society. Instead it acts as an catalyst towards peopel fighting against non -violence by And as far as the increasing rate of violence in children by wthe media is concerned it can avoided by strict parental control .

Hi I have seen in many messages people mention about erin's word list. cud anyone tell me the link for it.I have my gre on 18 and wanna go thru it.

from banglore writing GRE on 18 th

if all four are 90 then sum of any two will be 180 so then no two angles of triangle can be greater than 180 similarly if in quad 3 are 90 then as sum is 360 so fourth is also 90 => same case kingKHAN

cud u give the options properly