Issue task - Understanding the past is of little use to those in current positions of leadership. Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take.

[varadnair]

 

Leadership is a skill which is acquired by a person who leads a group of people.

People, in contemporary world, believe in latest methods of solution which requires

modern views and trends. However, knowing the history is useful for leaders to

know about the past history and analyse the trend. Therefore, this essay disagreees

with the arguement given in the prompt and provides enough evidences along With

supporting statements to opine on the disagreements.

 

Nowadays, the world in emerging out of orthodox opinions and becoming more and

more practical. Digitalization, urbanization and globalization are ruling over

everyone's mind. Even in the leadership, although people are hunting for talented

and invigorating youngsters, who have plenty of energy and tactics, understanding

past situation of any domain would still prove a benefit.

 

For example , lets presume that a new leader is elected, that person needs to 

analyze the trends based on previous past experiences of the public so that he

could employ some methodologies to fill the shortcomings faced former authority

Another example would be a lead marketer belonging to a campaign team of an

esteemed organization, the person would think over the history and problems

faced during the past tenure, and will try to override the situation by new

techniques to attract more audience.

 

To conclude, in this modern era, there are lot of unprecedented situations to

champion over which, considerably, requires critical thinking for the solutions about

day to day life problems. However, learning about the past comes into use for the

one's in the current authoritative positions, to make judgements in order to avoid

any sort of loss.