tsdvj

I think you should look for the right action verb before you think of will and could. The verb 'view' doesn't fit the second part of the sentence. The second part works only with 'think'. Given that, d and e are the only two options. E is obviously wrong since it talks about a single power station and not 'powerstations' as does the first part of the sentence. HTH

Where in the US ? ( to see if it is close enough to send )

I don't think the score that is reported will differ. :o

As usual, a "custom" reply from Erin!! (Hats off to you, Erin !!)

BTW, 2 years is a very long time for GMAT, IMO.

Hi, Coincidentally, there is a post by another "snakeyes" in the section "Just finished my GMAT" - that can give you some tips for studying.

The Official Guide is the Bible. For practice use Kaplan, Kaplan 800 and Princeton Review. Take the powerprep test before the Official Guide. And of course, visit Testmagic Often :)

I have not received my official score, so I don't know my exact percentile -- I guess it should be in the top 10. I am yet to check out which schools I can get in.

Hi Erin, I got a 162 on the LSAT. Can you comment on this score? Again, thanks for the efforts to help me with Logical Games.

The key word is "substances" . Don't get confused by "one of ". "substances" match with "tell" One of the substances -- stands for one picked among the many........ All those can "tell" You should have the underline button next to the italics button when you are entering the post under the Format buttons. Check the Forum Code

Congrats Mariam!!!! That is a great score !!:cool:

Erin, I remember seeing the qualification for the private forum to be 100 posts -- has it been recently changed to 200? I guess you know my stats -- if not, where should I post my stats? I read the post regarding the stats -- but I did not see anyone's stats there-- have you moved it ? What about the one's that are not accepted? Hope I can become a member:D

In case anyone is hunting for info on LSAT, I'll try to answer the best I can. I am posting this since I got a lot of help for GMAT from TM, but when I turned to TM for help regarding LSAT, I found that Erin was the only one who responded. Let us get going about LSAT at TM. I especially like the Logical Games section ( which I did not do well in the LSAT ;) ) It is an interesting challenge -- if you have any questions please let me know -- I'll try to answer. Also, the RC and CR in LSAT follow some predictable patterns, in my opinion.

Erin, I took my LSAT on Feb 8. I was comfortable with RC and CR, but I could satisfactorily cover only 2 out of the 4 problems in Games. I have got some questions in the other 2 and guessed on the others. There were only 22 questions (normal expected is a 24 atleast). I am not very happy with the Games performance. :( I will let you know my scores.... I'm keeping my fingers crossed. I think whatever practice I had did help with my games. I should have just put in more time (which I did not [V] ) Thanks for all your help.

Erin, The new look is definitely better -- And I love the small flowers on the new posts since last login ... :D

Congrats on your score !!!

I don't remember getting RC's back to back. But I guess you cannot preclude that happening. RC just takes time, it isn't that bad :) .... OK, it is a little bad:D

Indeed Erin, I feel somewhat better -- I tackled some games and now I feel I understand the key element -- finding all cases that are rejected by the conditions. Hope my score improves now:)

Erin -- I am very,very sorry........... the answer is indeed 2 -- there are so many tests and keys that I got mixed up.The problem is in Preptest XIII - Section 1, Question 2. Again, sorry for wasting your time ...

Erin, the source is the 10 Actual, Official LSAT Preptests book by LSAC

Erin, I found out that part of my problem is that I don't carry the rules far enough -- I make some obvious deductions but tend not to notice the 'deeper' deductions. Here is one I am not getting : Exactly 8 consumers -- F,G,H,J,K,L,M and N will be interviewed by market researchers. The 8 will be divided into exactly two 4 person groups -- group 1 and 2 -- before the interviews begin. Each person is assigned to exactly one of the two groups according to the following conditions: F must be in the same group as J G must be in a different group from M If H is in group 1, then L must be in group 1 If N is in group 2, then G must be in group 1. Ques : If K is in the same group as N, which one of the following MUST be true? 1. G is in group 1 2. H is in group 2 3. J is in group 1 4. K is in group 2 5. M is in group 1. The correct choice given is 3. I am not able to rule out the following possibility: group1 - KNGL group2 - HFJM In the above case, J is not in group 1 With the LSAT on Saturday, I have a long way to go!!! [xx(] [xx(]

I got some good basic grammar sites while surfing the net -- ones that are useful for GMAT. I will perhaps post the link later sometime.....

Nil, Try Princeton Review and downdowndown.net. There is a lot of GMAT plus material too, I guess -- but from Erin's posts, I understand that they are not good.

Oops, did I say underline the words?[xx(] My mistake Write down the words in the scratch paper in sequence with paragraph no. (now, this is what I meant to say ;) )

I think you have understood the two things the opposite way: Issue essay - You are given a topic and you have to write about the topic -- Usually, you are given a chance to take a stand - For example, let us say, the topic is: Flatter organizational structures are more efficient than hierarchical structures. You can say yes, flatter organizations are better or no, hierarchical ones are better or there are pros and cons in both, and you suggest a mix. Argument essay - you are given an argument which usually has atleast a basic assumption and a conclusion. There may be additional elements like supplementary conclusions, expected objections to the argument and extra assumptions. You have to say whether the argument is sound or not. You may have to find loopholes or weaknesses in the argument and prove that the conclusion is not adequately supported. On the other hand, if you find the argument convincing, you have to prove that. This is how it works in the GMAT. I guess it is the same in the GRE. Just check it out with the questions available to you. p.s. That is a nice user-id, by the way -- you could have called it Muskan-1000Watt / 1000WattSmile