grad2009

Hospital statistics regarding people who go to the emergency room after roller-skating accidents indicate the need for more protective equipment. Within this group of people, 75 percent of those who had accidents in streets or parking lots were not wearing any protective clothing(helmets, knee pads, etc.) or any light reflecting material(clip-on lights, glow-in-the-dark wrist pads, etc.).Clearly, these statistics indicate that by investing in high-quality protective gear and reflective equipment, roller skaters will greatly reduce their risk of being severely injured in an accident, The speaker asserted that the sole cause of roller-skating accidents in streets or parking lots is for not using or apathy for using protective clothing like helmets, knee pads etc. Moreover, this assumption is made from a hospital statistics, which indicates 75 percent of accidents happen only for not using protective clothing, but, it does not tell us the details of this statistical analysis and hence, it is not realistic enough to sustain the speaker's judgment. Finally, the speaker has blindly proposed to invest in high quality protective gear and reflective equipments to reduce the severe injury in accidents. On the basis of the above I will elaborate the flaws in the argument in the following discussion. Though, using protective instrument during skating is necessary, yet, not using it is not the only reason for the accident. Accident may happen for several other reasons like reckless skating, not following traffic rules and sometimes may be it is not at all the fault of the skater, it is some high speeding vehicles caused the curse. So, this is one of the main flaws of this argument. However, the speaker’s opinion could be substantiated by proper statistics, which has accounted handsome number of accidental events, in different cities in all over the world or covers a large area and then, by analyzing those data, it could be inferred that the cause of 75 percent accidents are only because of not using protective instruments. It is not clear from the argument that how this statistical analysis has been done, the speaker, might have collected a very few incidents in a small area and on the basis of that miniscule information taking the decision. Finally, the speaker suggested for the investment of high quality protective equipment as a solution to reduce the number of accidents; nonetheless, after investing in protective instruments, it is not guaranteed that the accidents will reduce significantly because of the vague statistics provided herewith. One might find that the percentage of accidents are not at all decreased, rather increased after investing high amount behind those protective devices. To conclude, I must vote for the use of protective equipments to reduce the accidents of roller skater but could not be able to suggest for an investment for only buying protective guard and reflecting device, rather will collect some realistic data and after analyzing those information take the final decision whether to invest for a particular devices or to impose some exemplary punishment for violating traffic rules or whatever relevant..

anything pertinent is relevant...similarly anything redundant is superfluous

it is from BB...if you closely observe the number in %, you will see that very few test takers have been able to answer it correctly...for the above analogy I think the % was in between 20-30...as i understand, ets divides questions in different difficulty levels...so it must be the toughest....rate 5

if anyone go through the BB verbal questions thoroughly and could digest almost all words what will be his/her verbal score......

if anyone go through the BB verbal questions thoroughly and could digest almost all words what will be his/her verbal score......

4. The First World War began in a context of jargon and verbal delicacy and continued in a cloud of ____ as ______ as language and literature, skillfully used, could make it. first word should be related with "jargon and verbal delicacy(+ve)...so it is obviously euphemism.......second word should have some +ve or -ve quality like language and literature....so it may be lucid but it is against euphemism or jargon....so i think now u can link.... other one is not totally clear to me

People should not be praised for their virtue if they lack energy to be ___ ; in such cases goodness is merely the effect of ___ should not be praised for their virtue....it means they dont show virtue...so first blank should be opposite of virtue......second blank should be something which is related to lack of energy rather the cause of that...so it is indolence----

sorry for the mistake STRUT::WING beam: door axle: wheel guy: pylon root: plant twig: branch INFLATE::BURST atrophy: evaporate pull: tear expose: hide excavate: increase break: shatter ENFRANCHISE::VOTE advertise: sell fumigate: kill filter: purify illuminate: see ignite: burn

STRUT::WING beam:door axle:wheel guy:pylon root:plant twig:branch INFLATE::BURST atrophy:evaporate pull:tear expose:hide excavate:increase break:shatter ENFRANCHISE::VOTE advertise:sell fumigate:kill filter:purify illuminate:see ignite:burn

miller works with grain and tanner works with hide.....this bridge only support the answer....it is a question with rate 5

I think structure means the organization of ur essay...like introduction,main body and ultimately conclusion....in ur essay u have only tried to write about the topic in each and every paragraph...which is actually the main body of ur essay....if u start ur essay with an introduction which will actually give an abstruct view of ur essay and then elaborate ur points then it will be better.finally u have to conclude by supporting ur points and some additional points u could have discussed.... thanks

Is it?anyway,Thank u very much for ur valuable suggestions and prompt response....see you again....

hello guys why dont u give some comments on my essay posted yesterday.please give ur valuable comments...my exam is started knocking my door

I think ready is used here as quickness wit is to learn.....so as temper is volatile wit is ready

"It is unfortunate that today's educator’s place so much emphasis on finding out what students want to include in the curriculum and then giving it to them. It is the educators' duty to determine the curriculum and the students' duty what is presented to them" The curriculum should be prepared by the educators at schools or universities because the educators are more aware than the students to decide what a student should know during his/her course of study to complete the ultimate perspective of the course work.However, students can be involved during the preparation of a certain course work just to know their specific interests or whether they feel it as too easy or very difficult to complete within the specified time.But, it should be keep in mind that an educator is more matuared than a student, so the ultimate objective of the course work should not be hindered in any way.I will elaborate it in details with relevant examples in the following discussion. If we consider the undergraduate course work of engineering at certain universities or colleges, we will see that all engineering students generally follow the same coursework in their first year of studies,independent of their stream. An engineer from electical decipline might feel uncomfortable during the mechanics class and may force to omit the mechanics from their course work because he/she is not matured enough to understand the fact that he/she should know all basics of engineering to reach the prime destination. In this case, it is an educator's duty to make him understand the real fact and stick to the curriculum,prepared by them. Nonetheless, if we go ahead with the above example, we will find that sometimes it is also required to hear the students voice in some specific cases.Todays technology is not static,it is always progressing in its own pace.So, we should follow the technological trends and according to that should modify our curriculum of studies.The course work of engineering today should not be as it was in five years ago. A student of electronics may feel that in their course work ,for example, the integrated circuit designing technogy subject only covers those details which are totally obsolate and not used in todays world. He/She may sought for the inclusion of modern technology in their course work and the educators should give their honest efforts to fulfill students logical need. Additionally, it has also been observed that some students run behind the certificate or documented expertise in some specific fields to enhance their chances of getting high paid salary in the industry.In this case a student can object against the curriculum and may sought for the inclusion of the subject of interest.As an example, an undergraduate student of computer science may feel that 'JAVA' is a subject which will increase his chance of getting high salary in the IT sector.But the coursework is not built to learn any specific language rather built for the basic understanding of programming languages.The educator should not entartain the students need because it impede the basic objective of the coursework. In sum, it should be noted that a curriculum is meant to fulfill the complete objective of certain coursework,it does not matter whether it has been determined mostly by the educators or by the students.It should cover all basic goals of that particular course and let student to progress further.