harishr1981

what is the difference in B & D

its B or E, both makes meaning clear but E maintains parallelism too

between A&D, i will go for A

Imo b

IMO E... we do not need parallelism, but cause effect relation, so enabling is better than to enable, 1-4 out AMD or Employees, AMD's employees enable AMD, 1-3 out among 2-5, 5/E is clear winner

IMO C... each requires was

IMO D as well... i was attracted to B but it has missing "of"

IMO B problem: snow geese population has increased, which is causing displacement of other species. solution: if we kill more(>5%) snow geese, then we can save other species what can weaken the argument: 1. snow geese not growing at rate more than 5% 2. there is something else causing displacement. A - this at max might support the argument but not weaken it B - hunting never closed before scheduled date => not even 5% are killed till date, so we should reach 5% limit first and see if that helps. C - more and more are already killed. this does not support/weaken D - no mention of geese colonization in passage E - no mention of natural predation in passage

increased taxes means more price... so home country product can compete only if price of foreign things are increased... which means things from other countries are cheaper

E for me as well

x is enough to y / so x as to y • Manhattan GMAT Forums so-x-as-to-y is correct idiom

it must be D

IMO D... the reason starts with A and then arguments against it...

Imo c...

IMO D.... I am not sure if not only-and also is correct, so rejected A&B "such as for" does not look right, so rejected C&E