Apex231

Is the answer A? It has similar comparison structure as the original sentence.

A seems to be the answer.It

Can someone explain how can we select the correct answer by eliminating wrong answer choices in this question? What is wrong with option A?

B. slowing the growth or destroying C. destroying or slowing the growth of Doesn't option C sound like as if the "growth" is being destroyed and not the pre-cancerous cells?.

Last year 4/5 of the applicants for a job on a police force passed the physical examination. If 3/4 of the applicants who passed the physical examination also passed the written examination, how many of the applicants passed both examinations ? (1) The number of applicants who did not pass either examination was equal to the number who passed the written examination only. (2) There was a total of 100 applicants. OA is

If b is the product of three consecutive positive integers c, c + 1, and c + 2, is b a multiple of 24 ? (1) b is a multiple of 3, (2) c is odd. OA is

To maintain tense consistency "were" is preferred. However, I am confused about the choice between B and D. Do we need to retain "their" in the sentence because the original option contains it? Do we have an Official Explanation for this?

2) AX^2 + 1 is positive for all x It's still not clear to me why stmt 2 is not sufficient. consider values x = 1 and A For condition 2 to satisfy for all values of x, A has to be positive or am i missing something?

Is the answer B?

B is the OA. Statement 1 is insufficient as parajulibharat explained above.

Well, you are right that the number of employees can range from 1 to infinity. However, according to condition 1 and 2, only 35 percent of the projects can have number of employees ranging from 1 to 2 and 25 percent of projects can have employees ranging from 4 to n. The remaining 40 percent of the projects will have 3 employees. When the number of employees are arranged in ascending order, irrespective of what their values are and that can range from 1 to infinity, 3 will fall in the middle and hence will be the median.

Can someone explain what's wrong with B?

(B) advocating respect for basic rights of citizens for its own sake © a coupling of moral ideals with self-interest Can someone explain what's wrong with option B? Because the option B talks about basic rights and option C talks about moral ideals.

(1) W + C > 50 - Insufficient (2) C > 48 - Insufficient Combining (1) and (2), when C = 49, then according to condition 1, W + 49 > 50. This means W > 1. when C = 55, then according to condition 1, W + 55 > 50. This means W >= -4. Not clear whether W is positive or negative. Hence E.

Lets say at the half time the opponent scored x goals and M&M scored x-3 goals. Condition (1) - At the end of second half - M&M's score = (x-3) + 4 = x+1 Opponent's score -> don't know as we don't know how many goals did the opponent score. Insufficient. Condition (2)- Total goals scored by opponent = 4. M&M's score -> don't know, all we know is that M&M was trailing by 3 goals at the half time. No other information available so insufficient. Combining (1) and (2) - Total score of opponent = 4 M&M's score at the end of first half = 0 or 1, considering whether opponent scored 3 or 4 goals in first half. M&M's total score at the end of second half = 4 or 5, so M&M either won or the match was drawn. Combining (1) and (2) not sufficient. So E is the answer.