Jump to content
Urch Forums

manne

Members
  • Posts

    57
  • Joined

Converted

  • My Tests
    No

manne's Achievements

Newbie

Newbie (1/14)

1

Reputation

  1. stem: Cost= X*Thinkness*Length^2, where X is coefficient of proportion/price per unit of length and thikness Choice 1 gives the price difference of Th1 L1 X and Th2 L2 X. 0.2*4*X=0.1*4*X+160 X=400 Sufficient the same with 2 thus D
  2. 1. I'll take A instead of B. 'instead of' denotes substitution - i will not take A, i'll take B as a substitute of A. 2.I'll rather take A than B. 'rather than' denotes preference - both A and B are ok, but I prefer A and I will take A more eagerly than I would take B.
  3. DoingMyPart, Mt.Rainer, So, the only difference I see is: specially 1. in a special manner; "a specially arranged dinner" [syn: especially] 2: to a distinctly greater extent or degree than is common; "he was particularly fussy about spelling"; especially 1: to a distinctly greater extent or degree than is common;"he was particularly fussy about spelling"; 2. in a special manner; "a specially arranged dinner" [syn: specially]
  4. i choose E, because it's the only variant without ambiguous 'they/their' referring to 'army'. but even E doesn't look perfect
  5. agree with 800Bob, It's A Besides, I doubt that 'to contend something' (as in E) is idiomatic. What do you think?
  6. C 'to deal' seems more precise. What's the difference btw specially and Especially ???
  7. gmat0850 what scares me in C is 'formation is when materials combust'. Formation is a process, not a time. It cannot be 'when'. May be, this question is not properly worded. May be the authors meant 'Imperceptible to the eye or the nose' ? :)
  8. B 'require that the info be published' - idiomatic
  9. A says 'evidence for societies' E says 'evedence that societies arose simultaneously' Logically, it is the point of when and how societies arose rather than a point of whether there were any societies.
  10. B. completely avoids ambiguity. Other variants use strange ellipse of the verb.
  11. only D clearly says 'monoxide is formed when materials are combusted' but 'monoxide imperceptible to the ear' is really strange
  12. 1. 'Majority view but think' - only D&E maintain parallelism. E. 'would in the future' - wrong tense, sice we have Present (view) not Past hence D 2. waiting for a reasonable explanation :) The only thing that bothers me in D is abundance of 'like', while B is more precise.
  13. not A,B,D because of 'that' meaning 'goods' not C because of 'goods in worth'. It looks unidiomatic and even if it's not, imho it means smth like 'valuable goods' Hence E
  14. I see it in the following way: now B doesn't have this useless 'by' preposition, but still B parallels unequal concepts: 'such a variety of criteria as ABC'. Variety parallel with ABC. But these ABC are not a variety, they are certain criteria. A says: 'variety of criteria such as ABC'. Criteria and ABC are parallel. That's why I chose A. hope it helps
  15. C. there's elipse here. Second 'are' is not obligatory, like in 'I'm as old as you (are)' A. unidiomatically says 'MG are likely in planning'
×
×
  • Create New...