Search the Community

Education is an efficient tool that exists not only in educational sector but also in corporate sectors as well. Universities, Schools & corporations hire teacher to educate their students or employees. High authorities or management work with teachers and his/her proficiency to decide the compensations. The prompt states that a teacher's salary should be solely contingent upon their students academic performance. In my opinion, I disagree with the statement because there is a little relationship between the students performance with teacher's calibre, though, there are many other factors(discussed in below paragraphs) which can help in deciding the teacher's calibre and compensation. To begin, the relationship between a teacher and a student is like 2 tyres of a cycle. It should not only be the teacher's responsibility to involve best practices for imparting maximum knowledge to students, but students should also be willing to travel along the ride and should have the ardency to gain as much knowledge as possible. If either of these tyres rupture, the cycle can't move. To illustrate, consider a "Data structures & Algorithms" professor in a university, who works assiduously, conducting the timely classes, providing notes, assignments, arranging practicals, taking tutorials and doubt sessions for the students through the semester, but if the students of his class are apathetic to teachers effort and take little to no use of the provisions, they will end up scoring bad in semester exams. Even if the teacher has been up to the mark, It is the students unattentiveness and laxity in academics responsible for the bad academic performance. In such a case, the student's academic performance doesn't qualify as the accurate metrics for the teacher's calibre and salary at all. The view that students academic performance shouldn't decide the teacher's calibre doesn't mean that students don't play any role in judging the teacher's calibre or compensation, rather students can play a major role here. For a teacher to successful at his/her role, the teacher should be affable and approachable. Students shouldn't feel formidable about their lack of knowledge or silly doubts, while approaching the teacher. Rather, teacher should maintain a healthy environment by encouraging students to ask even the most frivolous doubts. Universities or schools can make use of efficient contemporary tool i.e Feedback System. Students should be presented with a feedback forms quarterly(or at any other intervals) to rate the teacher based on different parameters like affability, knowledge of the topic, expressability, punctuality etc. Universities can make maximum use of such metrics while judging the teacher's performance and deciding compensation. Such a system would not only help authorities to judge the teachers but it would also provide an opportunity for the teacher to improve at their weaker aspects. There are numerous other metrics that can be utilized while deciding the teacher's compensation. At the time of hiring, university/school authorities or higher management conduct the interviews to judge the applicants knowledge and decide their compensation accordingly. As knowledge isn't static, it might be the case that a teacher had less knowledge at the time of hiring but with time the teacher had worked and improved which deserves a better compensation. In such cases, universities or schools can conduct the timely tests to judge their performance and base the compensation of teacher on that. High authorities and management can also make use of evidences like citation, publications, books written by a teacher while deciding upon the teacher's salary. Evidently, a teacher with more renowned publication or citation deserves better acknowledgement and compensation than rest. In essence, from the above mentioned views, it seems correct to say that student's academic performance shouldn't be the metrics to judge the teacher's calibre and decide the compensations. Instead, there are many other tools like citation, publications, feedback systems which ease out the job in deciding the compensation for the teachers.

By and large, as time went by, some people have called into question whether ones had better give others a hand in terms of educate themselves or surrounded folks do not play a vital role here. There has been no shortage of debates among scholars that this tendency could not head to a wide-range of privileges not only for those who want to learn, but also the helpers. Thus, I am in agreement with the idea. In what follows, I will delve into the most excellent reasons to substantiate my viewpoint. The first thing now looping up in my head to say about the desirability of ones are be tough how is it possible to improve their knowledge by themselves related to being independent. What I am trying to say is that individuals, in particular, young generation might crave a niche for themselves to learn stand on their own two feet and acquire a well-rounded knowledge. In fact, related infrastructure, methods of learning, educational ammonites, and so forth cannot always are being provided for ones to without difficulties take in as much s possible. It is crystal clear they need be relay on themselves even for such aspects. Let me shed light on my point, I fail to remember vividly, but if my mind serves me right, it was many years ago when one of my teachers used to make up her mind so as to literacy teach me how pick a fish instead of the fishing . To cut a long story short, had I not tough in the home sit in the seat and have my noise in books, I would have not passed exams like a straight student. Another thing ought to bear in my mind is that a rewarding thing is often said that teaching others to broaden their horizons by means of themselves is next to godliness. Besides it goes without saying that no man is an island, hence, we influenced by others, specially, our way of thinking that is of important. Simply put, should people join their hand in this path, not only will ones do ethical acts, which possess far-reaching inmates on themselves, but also they those helpers will foster oval sense of well-being. For instance, in schools recently has been received wide currency to teachers get used to teaching a core lessons that so-called path of research,. Which can play a role for the sake tertiary education, however this lesson is being tough without salary. To sum up, considering the points above mentioned, the most rational conclusion to be drawn is that I have a deeply-held belief, albeit, in the twenty-first century, area provided facilities of learning, helping others to educate themselves is for the good of all society whether teachers or learners.

Today, I was surfing the net and stumbled a topic about teachers who are involve in ; let us just say "irresponsible actions" in using their social networking site pages. Now, do you think they should be punished? :encouragement:

:question: Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Parents are the best teachers. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. :idea: Learning process is a never ending process. As long as one lives, he/she always has to learn. In learning process, one needs mentors, tutors, teachers, or the like, who can give him/her guidance, examples, direction, instruction, etc. and can serve as role models. An interesting question then arises: who can teach the best? Many people find that their parents are their best teachers in their lifetime. I agree with them. Here are my reasons, based on my own experience. First, parents are the ones who love and care the most about their children, and thus, the former will always feel responsible for the latter’s future. Every parent intrinsically wants a better future for his/her children and accordingly, always makes the best effort to help them achieve success. Although teachers at schools are well educated and trained to love their pupils, teachers’ love will never be equal to parents’ love. Second, parents are the ones who are closest to their children. They both live in the same house and share the same ups and downs together. As the result, they interact with each other more intensively and more intimately than with any other people. Supposedly, parents know the best how their children behave and what their children want, need, or even feel. Subsequently, parents know the best how to treat and educate their children in various conditions or situations. They can decide wisely what their children should or shouldn’t do. In conclusion, parents are the best nurturers of their children. No one else can assume parents’ position because the bond between parents and their children is unique and stronger than any other interpersonal bonds.