ekonomiks Posted April 1, 2007 Share Posted April 1, 2007 There is a thread out there that contains profiles, and people report results in their signatures, but combining the two takes some time. So let's just put them all together in this one thread. Please fill out the following form and be as detailed as possible. Those who are still waiting for final decisions, please wait until you receive them all before you post. Also, please limit discussion in this thread. *** ANY DISCUSSION WILL TAKE PLACE HERE: http://www.www.urch.com/forums/phd-economics/66815-discussion-profiles-results-2007-a.html#post440442 PROFILE: Type of Undergrad: Undergrad GPA: Type of Grad: Grad GPA: GRE: Math Courses: Econ Courses: Other Courses: Letters of Recommendation: Research Experience: Teaching Experience: Research Interests: SOP: Other: RESULTS: Acceptances: Waitlists: Rejections: What would you have done differently? 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
butler blue Posted April 2, 2007 Share Posted April 2, 2007 Profile: Gre: 800 Q, 650 V, 6.0 A Type of Undergrad: Basically a liberal arts college; good but not elite GPA: Overall: 3.99, Econ: 4.0, Math: 4.0 Classes: Math: Calc I through III (A's), Linear Algebra (A), Analysis I (A), Differential Equations (A), Probability & Statistics I and II (A's), Topology (A), Topics in Game Theory (A), Discrete Math I and II (A's), Modern Algebra (A), Analysis II (in progress) Econ: Intro (A), Int Micro (A), Int Macro (A), International Econ (A), Econometrics (A), Comparative Economic Systems (A), Environmental and Natural Resource Econ (A), Math Econ (in progress) Other: A programming course... Research Experience: Summer research program within my university producing a paper about Doha's potential impact on China; Senior thesis on the political economy of foreign aid donation Teaching Experience: Lots of tutoring econ and math but no TA'ing LORs: One from the econ prof (Ph.D. from Pitt) who advised both of my research projects; one from another econ prof (Ph.D. UCLA); one from my real analysis prof (Ph.D. Indian Institute of Technology). All of them were very high on me and know me well, but the economists are not well-known or well-published. SoP & Interests: Talked about my interest in research, reasons for applying to the Ph.D., particular interest in working in development policy institutions, and reasons why I was interested in their department. Other: American citizen Admissions Decisions Berkeley - Rejected Brown - Rejected Columbia - Rejected Georgetown - Accepted w/ fellowship funding for 2 years and all summers Harvard - Rejected Indiana - Accepted w/ TA Johns Hopkins - Rejected Maryland - Accepted, no funding UCLA - Accepted, no funding UC Santa Cruz - Accepted, partial TAship Virginia - Accepted Yale - Rejected What I learned: Research programs throroughly to find ones that fit your career goals and then be honest. I did what is generally taboo in my SOP by stating outright my interest in policy over academia. It may have hurt me some places, but I ultimately got into programs that fit what I want to do. Also, don't get caught up in groupthink on this board. I should have applied to Cornell (given my interests) but didn't because of concern on here about their placements. I may very well not have gotten in (given my record with Ivy's) but I should've applied there. Finally, it is true; your undergrad school is very important, but you can still get into a good (though probably not top tier) school coming from somewhere no one's heard of if everything else is top notch. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nalfien Posted April 2, 2007 Share Posted April 2, 2007 PROFILE: Type of Undergrad: SUNY University Center Undergrad GPA: Econ (4.0)/Math (3.8) overall 3.84 Type of Grad: None Grad GPA: None GRE: 800/590/5.5 Math Courses: Multi Variable Calc A- , Diff Eqs A, Real Analysis A, Measure Theory A, Linear Algebra I B+ &II A, Computational A, Typical Math Major, Econ Courses: Grad Micro, Metrics. undegrad Math Stats, Metrics, Money and Banking, Computational, Interm Micro and Macro. A's Other Courses: Honors College Letters of Recommendation: 3 strong ones. One very very strong one. I really think the biggest reason I got in where I got in is because one of my recommenders put his neck out for me and called people to tell them about me. Research Experience: Year long honors thesis senior year. Teaching Experience: none Research Interests: Labor, Development SOP: Pretty nice... I think, didn't hear anything bad about it. two pages. Other: Used to go to departmental research seminars since sophmore year, got my face seen and showed an interest in research. RESULTS: Acceptances: Stanford ($)Yale ($)UCLA ($)UVa ($)UNC ($)..... no money: UCSDU,Mich Waitlists: UPenn,NWU,NYU Rejections: Princeton,Berkeley,Columbia,Duke What you would have done differently: I would have applied to less places. But there is no way I would have imagined I would have made out how i did. Very very fortunate. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
applying07 Posted April 2, 2007 Share Posted April 2, 2007 PROFILE: Type of Undergrad: Large Private Undergrad GPA: 3.81 (Econ: 3.9, Math: 4.0) GRE: 800Q, 560 V, 6.0A Math Courses: Calc I-III, Lin Alg, Prob Theory Econ Courses: Principles, Intermediate Theories, Stats, Intl. Econ, Econ Thought, Environmental Econ, Econometrics, Intl. Econ Relations, Senior Thesis Other Courses: A bunch of other International Studies class (poli sci, sociology, etc.) Letters of Recommendation: Associate Prof. (Ph.D. MIT) thesis advisor and teacher, Assistant Prof (Ph.D. BC) Econometrics Teacher, Associate Math Prof. Lin Alg Teacher Research Experience: Senior Thesis, summer of consulting as an RA Teaching Experience: Tutoring Research Interests: Trade and Development SOP: Probably nothing too special, described career goals, why wanted to study econ and bits about each school RESULTS: Acceptances: Duke Michigan State Boston College UNC-CH Colorado Rejections: MIT Northwestern Brown UMich Columbia What would you have done differently? Maybe waited a year and taken more math or worked doing a research job to fill in those gaps. Pretty happy with how turned out though 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sonicskat Posted April 2, 2007 Share Posted April 2, 2007 PROFILE: Type of Undergrad: Small Liberal Arts...Not well known Undergrad GPA: 3.76 GRE: 760/510/5.5 Math Courses: Calc 1-3, Proofs and Topology Class, Linear Algebra, Diff Eq Econ Courses: Inter. Micro/Macro, Business, Math, Experimental, Forecasting, Econometrics, Statistics, Int'l trade and finance Letters of Recommendation: Two Associate professors (Duke and MSU), and one Assistant Professor (FSU) Research Experience: One paper published in undergraduate journal, research using dynamic programming with two professors ongoing, presented at professional conferences twice, associate editor for undergraduate journal for two years, presented at campus research forum twice. Research Interests: Macro, Int'l SOP: Wrote how I have adequate math skills, despite no real analysis. Briefly discussed extensive research experiences. Then honed in on a couple professor's who's work I enjoy. RESULTS: Acceptances: UVA, MSU, UC Davis, Vanderbilt, Rice,UCSB Waitlists: Pitt (i guess), ASU (i guess) Rejections: UT Austin, Iowa What would you have done differently? Taken more math and gotten an 800 on the gre 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
commodore Posted April 2, 2007 Share Posted April 2, 2007 PROFILE: Type of Undergrad: top 20 private research university with an average econ department Undergrad GPA: 4.0 Type of Grad: none Grad GPA: n/a GRE: 800 Q/750 V/ 6.0 AW Math Courses: calc I & II (A), linear algebra (A), diff eq (A), advanced calc (A), stats (A), applied stats (in progress) Econ Courses: everything, all A's Letters of Recommendation: three good ones, two from people who are somewhat known. It turns out that one of my recommenders is a friend of Truman Bewley, Yale's DGS. I didn't know that until last week. I certainly hope that's not the reason I got in, but in looking at the results, I have to wonder. Research Experience: undergraduate honors thesis (to be submitted for publication:luck2:) Teaching Experience: 2 semesters as a TA for intro micro & macro Research Interests: development, labor, economics of education, IO, trade SOP: I really don't think it matters much. I talked about wanting to do development. I hid my love of teaching and played up my love of research. RESULTS: Acceptances: Yale ($) Northwestern (no funding) Michigan (no funding) Kennedy School ($) Duke PubPol ($) Waitlists: Brown Rejections: Princeton Berkeley Stanford Cornell Attending: Yale What would you have done differently? I'm not really sure what was wrong with my application, but I'm very glad to have gotten into Yale, and I'm sure I'll be happy there. I guess that if I had it to do over again, I'd apply to even more good schools, because admissions really are random sometimes. Cast a wide net and don't take anything for granted. I really thought Cornell and Brown were my fallbacks, and I didn't even get in. Doing it over again, I'd probably pick 3 or 4 more schools to apply to. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tunedradio Posted April 2, 2007 Share Posted April 2, 2007 PROFILE: Type of Undergrad: Top liberal arts college Undergrad GPA: 3.89 Type of Grad: audited 1st year micro, 2nd year development Grad GPA: N/A GRE: 800Q/700V/6.0A Math Courses: Multivariate Calc (A-) Linear Algebra (A), Real Analysis (currently taking), Statistics (A), Diff Eq. in High School Econ Courses: lots, A's throughout, A+'s in intermediate micro and macro Other Courses: lots of political science / development / policy Letters of Recommendation: one very famous, one very good one (coauthor) but junior, another junior Research Experience: substantial; senior honor's thesis, presentations at four conferences, year of RA full-time, co-authored (yet to be published) less-technical papers with two professors (one very famous) Teaching Experience: TA for three semesters (one at graduate level) Research Interests: devo / trade SOP: good (but it doesn't really matter) Other: RESULTS: Acceptances: NSF, Yale ($), Berkeley ARE ($), Michigan Econ/Public Policy ($), USSD ($), Penn State ($), Brown (waitlisted $), Duke ($), UC-Boulder ($), LSE (Msc) Waitlists: Princeton PolyEc PhD Rejections: Harvard KSG, Cornell, LSE (PhD), MIT What would you have done differently? I actually applied last year with substantial less math and research experience and was accepted into two top 20 programs but no top 10 programs (and honorable mentioned on the NSF), so for those who are considering it, I found a year of RAing and a few more classes (and better recs) can really boost your admits. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ekonomiks Posted April 2, 2007 Author Share Posted April 2, 2007 Hey hockeytime, I'm gonna copy your profile from the other thread and put it here for the sake of completeness. Let me know if you mind, I'll delete it. Profile: Gre: 800 Q, 700 V, 6.0 A GPA: Overall: 3.97 (Undergrad). 4.0 in all econ/math/quant courses. Ranked 2nd in my graduating class. Classes: Math: Lin Alg, Calc, Diff Eqs, Vector Calc, Real Analysis Econ: Intro to Micro and Macro, Intermediate Micro Graduate: Probability and Micro at the PhD level at a top US school Type of Undergrad: top Canadian undergrad school, major in Business, minor in Math. Research Experience: Full time RA at a top US school for the year prior to starting my PhD. Teaching Experience: None LORs: Three strong econ profs in my field at a top US school. SoP & Interests: Empirical IO. Energy/Telecom/High Tech sectors. Other: Worked in consulting after my undergrad (first in Management Consulting, then Economic Consulting). Somewhat atypical applicant because my undergrad was in business/math. Strong comp sci background, and very strong technical skills (several programming languages, STATA, etc). Admissions Decisions Berkeley - Rejected MIT - Rejected Princeton - Rejected Harvard Econ - Waitlisted (Declined) UCSD - Accepted UCLA - Accepted Duke - Accepted Stanford - Accepted Stanford GSB - Accepted Chicago Econ - Accepted Chicago GSB - Accepted Northwestern - Accepted Yale - Accepted Harvard Business Economics - Accepted, and attending in fall '07. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wobo82 Posted April 4, 2007 Share Posted April 4, 2007 PROFILE: Type of Undergrad: Top 25 research university per USNWR Undergrad GPA: 3.33 (electrical engineering BS) Type of Grad: Top 100-ish research university without an econ PhD program Grad GPA: 3.87 (economics MA) GRE: 790Q/670V/5.0A Math Courses: Calc I through III, Diff Eq, Matrix/Linear Algebra, Math Stats, Stochastic Proc, Analysis Econ Courses: Micro Theory, Applied Econometrics, bunch of field courses Other Courses: Bunch of undergrad EE courses (lots of Matlab, some C++) Letters of Recommendation: Three from econ profs at grad school. (They were not alumni of the schools I applied to so where they got their PhDs was of no consequence.) Research Experience: Very insignficant. Teaching Experience: None. Research Interests: Development, broadly speaking. SOP: I liked it. Other: Male, international RESULTS: Acceptances: USC (fellowship), UMD AREC (RA), UMN APEC (fellowship), UVA (waitlisted for aid), GWU (waitlisted for aid), UW-Seattle (no aid) No news as of Apr 3rd (not that I care anymore): UNC-CH, Pitt, Purdue Rejections: Berkeley ARE, Brown, Georgetown, Vanderbilt What would you have done differently? Nothing. (Well, perhaps tried the PowerPrep tests.) My personal circumstances were such that I couldn't have done things differently. I do feel that I had overestimated the difficulty of getting in (to the departments I chose) but underestimated the difficulty of getting funding. But hindsight is 20-20. The biggest holes in my profile going in were: unknown grad school, bad undergrad record, lack of research experience, complete absence of a macro course (taking my first one right now). I feared the lack of macro would shut me out from the straight econ depts. All in all I am happy with my acceptance tally. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snigai Posted April 4, 2007 Share Posted April 4, 2007 PROFILE: Type of Undergrad: International Student, top 10 University in the country, exhange student in the US. Undergrad GPA: 85% Type of Grad: MA in Economics, Top 3 University in the Region Grad GPA: 4,10 out of 4,33 GRE: 770/420/5.0, TOEFL: 115/120 Math Courses: Mathematics for Economists, Mathematical Programming Econ Courses: relevant Micro I, II; Macro I, II; Econometrics I,II all grad Other Courses: Statistics, Probability Letters of Recommendation: all grom grad economics professors Research Experience: GRA for 1 semester for visiting professor Teaching Experience: GTA for 2 semesters Research Interests: Macroeconomics, Monetary Economics SOP: It was allright I suppose ))) Other: RESULTS: Acceptances: UVA, Penn State, UC Riverside, American U (probably) Waitlists: Rejections: Harvard, Berkeley ,Cornell, Georgetown What would you have done differently?Nothing. I did the best I could. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kartelite Posted April 4, 2007 Share Posted April 4, 2007 PROFILE: Type of Undergrad: Graduated Top 20 LAC, after 2 years at Top 30 University Undergrad GPA: 3.79 both schools Type of Grad: Top 50, MS in Applied Mathematics Grad GPA: 4.00 (at time of application) GRE: 800Q, 640V, 5.5AWA Math Courses: Undergrad Math: Linear Algebra (A), Multivariable Calc (A-), Applied Stats (A), Probability (A), Operations Research (B+), Foundations of Mathematics (A-), Combinatorics (A), Number Theory (A), Abstract Algebra I/II (A/A), Real Analysis I/II (A/A-), Graph Theory (A), ODE's (A) Grad Math: Abstract Algebra (A), Linear Algebra (A-), Cryptography (A+), Functional Analysis (IP), Probability (IP), Combinatorics Seminar (IP) Econ Courses: Undergrad Econ: Intermediate Micro Theory (A-), Intermediate Macro Theory (A), Econometrics (A-), Int. Trade (A), Int. Finance (A), Econ Stats (A), Comparative Economics (B), Game Theory (A), Experimental Econ (A), Money and Banking (B), Mathematical Econ (A) Grad Econ: Phd-level Econometrics (IP) Letters of Recommendation: All math professors, 2 from undergrad (real analysis prof + adviser), 1 from grad (thesis adviser/probability prof) Research Experience: Summer REU program in mathematics, research assistant for a couple summers Teaching Experience: Calculus 2/pre-algebra/geometry instructor, Linear Algebra TA Research Interests: Decision theory, perhaps financial or international econ SOP: Yes Other: Cross country captain, NCAA Postgraduate Scholarship recipient, lots of sports awards; one publication from REU program, hoping to get thesis published in good journal; applied for NSF RESULTS: Acceptances: Virginia ($19,000) Duke ($17,000) UNC ($14,400) UCSD (none) Rejections: Princeton Kellogg MEDS Columbia Cornell What would you have done differently? Gotten recommendation from econ professor, sent master's thesis to someone at programs, applied to Stanford Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prometheus_Econ Posted April 4, 2007 Share Posted April 4, 2007 PROFILE: Type of Undergrad: Top 50 public university Undergrad GPA: 4.0 GRE: 800Q, 610V, 5.0AWA Math Courses (all As): Undergrad Math: 3 semesters Calculus, two semesters proof-based Linear Algebra, Intro to Statistics, Probability Theory, Differential Equations, Intro to Topology, Analysis 1, Game Theory and Math. Programming, Proof Writing, Stochastic Processes (IP), Analysis 2 (IP) Econ Courses (all As): Undergrad Econ: Intermediate Micro, Intermediate Macro, Intro Econometrics, Game Theory, Experimental Economics Grad Econ: Quantitative Methods, Micro 1, 2nd year seminar in behavioral economics Letters of Recommendation: 1 math professor, 2 econ professors, from 3 different universities, all advised me on research, only one I took classes with Research Experience: Summer REU program, independent research in mathematical finance, honors thesis, gave 2 seminar presentations and 1 poster presentation Teaching Experience: Calculus 1 (undergraduate TA), lots of tutoring Research Interests: Microeconomic Theory, Financial Economics SOP: emphasized research experience, and explained how I became interested in economics, customized last paragraph Other: Applied for NSF (got honorable mention), got several departmental scholarships and awards in mathematics RESULTS: Acceptances: (with fellowship) NYU Caltech UPenn (after being waitlisted for funding about 2 weeks) Carnegie Mellon Tepper Johns Hopkins University of Michigan (external funding) Boston University (with TAship) Penn State UT Austin (without funding first year) Wisconsin UCSD Rejections: Princeton Stanford GSB Harvard Harvard Business School Northwestern Berkeley Waitlisted: MIT Stanford What would you have done differently? I would have applied to Yale as well, and perhaps applied to less safety schools. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ockam Posted April 4, 2007 Share Posted April 4, 2007 hey, I just heard about this forum a couple weeks ago. wish I had know about it earlier, but I hope somebody else might find my info useful PROFILE: Type of Undergrad: large "top-ten" public research university w/ top 15ish econ dept Undergrad GPA: 3.95 overall, 3.97 math GRE: 800Q/610V/5.0 Math Courses: majored in math, with rigorous year-long sequences in analysis, stats, and abstract algebra. upper div electives included applied linear algebra and mathematical modeling. note to future applicants: the admissions director at princeton seemed to take very seriously the fact that i had taken the more rigorous math courses Econ Courses: very few: intro to micro, mathematical econ, grad-level micro. After applying, some macro and behavioral (and said I would do so on application) Other Courses: lots of philosophy including grad-level coursework in philosophy of science. Letters of Recommendation: These were probably the strongest part of my application. One from a full professor each of: econ, math, phil departments. Math letter came from my real analysis prof who is also a college provost. Phil letter was from my honors thesis advisor. I took a grad course with the econ prof. I know all my letter writers quite well, so there were lots of very specific things they could say about me. Research Experience: none in economics. Assisted research in epidemiology (with a sociologist) and genomics. Independent research in philosophy of science and sabermetrics. Teaching Experience: tutor/TA for the computer science dept (java) Research Interests: very broad. mostly micro and metrics, both theory and applied SOP: 700 words, nothing fancy. described how my background in math and phil led me to economics. said my interests in econ were broad and described a couple specific topics that interest me. Used mostly the same statement at every school, changing just the last two sentences for each application Other: Residential advisor, phil club president, and undergrad phil journal editor. RESULTS: Acceptances: full funding: Princeton, Stanford, Chicago, UPenn, Columbia, Northwestern Wisc-Madison, UBC no $: UCSD Waitlists: Yale, MIT Rejections: Harvard, Berkeley What would you have done differently? absolutely nothing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
econchick06 Posted April 4, 2007 Share Posted April 4, 2007 PROFILE: Type of Undergrad: Large, not highly ranked public university Major: Economics Minor: Mathematics Undergrad GPA: Overall: 3.96, Econ: 3.98, Math: 3.85 GRE: 780 Q, 600 V, 5.0 A Math Courses: Calc I through III, Diff Equations (A+), Discrete Math (A+), Foundations of Math (Intro to Proofs) (A-), Matrix Algebra (A+), Linear Algebra (A), Probability (A), Advanced Calc (A, only A in the class) Econ Courses: Undergrad: Int Micro (A+), Int Macro (A), IO (A+), Urban/Regional (A+), Public Choice (A+), Math Econ (A), Econometrics (A+), Development Econ (A), International Economics (A), Money and Banking (A+) Grad (taken as an undergrad): Macroeconomic Theory (A), Mathematical Economics I (A-) Other Courses: Intro Stats I and II (A+, A+), Intro to Comp Statistical Packags (SAS) (A+) Letters of Recommendation:3 econ profs- 1 who I RA'd for and co-authored w/, 1 from grad macro prof, 1 from department chair. Research Experience: RA for 1 year for one of my professors/TA this Two sort-of publications (co-authored with professor,1 empirical paper in non-peer reviewed journal, and one study funded by a think tank) Completed a thesis-type paper (we don't have a formal thesis program), will be submitting for publication shortly (and I did submit this paper to the schools I applied to as evidence of my research aptitude) Teaching Experience: TA one semester Research Interests: mostly applied micro SOP: talked about my experiences with and passion for research, first para was tailored to each school Other: founded economics club RESULTS: Acceptances: full funding: Chicago (Will be attending :D) Rochester Duke University of Maryland University of Virginia Johns Hopkins no funding: UCLA University of Pennsylvania (accepted off waitlist) Waitlists: Stanford Rejections: Harvard, Berkeley, UCSD, Michigan, Yale, Princeton, Columbia, NYU, Northwestern, MIT What would you have done differently? Hmm.. I think it turned out pretty well, I probably applied to too many schools but I am happy with the outcome and wouldn't really change anything. At least I don't have any "what ifs"! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mtjsvc Posted April 7, 2007 Share Posted April 7, 2007 PROFILE: Type of Undergrad: 3rd-tier LAC Undergrad GPA: 3.8 Type of Grad: straight from undergrad Grad GPA: N/A GRE: 800Q, 650V, 4.0AWA Math Courses: calc I-III (A-/A-/B), linear algebra (A), ordinary & partial diff eq (A), complex variables (A), topology (A-), real analysis I-II (A/IP), prob & stats (A), interest theory & financial math (IP) Econ Courses: micro/macro principles (A/A), intermediate micro/macro (B+/A), advanced micro/macro (A/A), econometrics (A), game theory (A), experimental econ (A), int. trade (A), int. finance (A) Letters of Recommendation: 2 econ profs (thesis advisor, advanced micro/macro prof), 1 math prof (real analysis/topology prof) Research Experience: senior thesis (experimental/labor), summer RA for experimental economist at a different university Teaching Experience: tutor and grader for micro/macro principles, tutor for advanced macro Research Interests: experimental econ, micro theory SOP: I talked about my experience with experimental econ (course, thesis, RA) Other: My undergrad school is small and not very good overall, but the econ training is focused on preparing us for PhD programs. About half of the econ majors here go for a PhD after graduating, with a good success rate in actually completing the degree. RESULTS: Acceptances: Ohio State (fellowship) Purdue (fellowship) Arizona (TA-ship) Penn State (TA-ship) Texas A&M (RA-ship) Virginia (TA-ship) Rejections: probably Carnegie Mellon, Indiana, and Pitt since they haven't admitted me yet What would you have done differently? I would have applied to a few higher ranked schools and not applied to a few lower ranked schools. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
macrodude84 Posted April 11, 2007 Share Posted April 11, 2007 Type of Undergrad: Graduated top 5% of top 10 university Undergrad GPA: 3.90 overall and major (double major math and economics) GRE: 800Q, 800V, 6.0 W Math Courses: Undergrad Math: Linear Algebra (A+), Differential Equations (A), Differential Geometry (A), Grad level Abstract Algebra (A-), Topology (A-), Grad level Real Analysis I/II (A-/A-), Statistics (A), Partial Differential Equations (A-) Econ Courses: Undergrad Econ: Intro Econ (A+), Intro Micro (A), Intermediate Macro (A), Intermediate Micro (A+), Intro Econometrics (A+), International Trade (A), Monetary Economics (A+), Health Economics (A-), Financial Economics (A), Industrial Organization (A), Game Theory (A+), International Macro (A) Grad Econ: PhD-level micro (A), PhD-level macro (A-), PhD-level econometrics (B+), Mathematical Economics (A+) Letters of Recommendation: All economics professors, including the chair of the department. Research Experience: Two years research with public policy professor, plus summer internship with think tank in DC. Teaching Experience: TA master's-level micro and macro Research Interests: Macroeconomic theory, search theory, labor economics (theory), some interest in behavioral econ RESULTS: Acceptances: UPenn (funding) Rejections: Princeton Harvard MIT What would you have done differently? Not really sure. Perhaps done a little better in the math classes. Written a better statement of purpose, maybe? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EconChump Posted April 12, 2007 Share Posted April 12, 2007 GRE: 800Q 610V 6.0AWA GPA: BSc Econ (1st Class), MPhil Econ (Pass, but near-miss on distinction) Classes: Math: 2 years of calc, linear algebra, stats; pure math - all ug. Econ: usual ug courses & electives; grad micro, macro, metrics, adv theory, IO. Type of Institution: LSE bsc econ; Oxford mphil econ. Research Experience: distinction-class mphil thesis in theoretical IO; 2x6-month long RAs (financial econometrics & environmental science); macroeconomic forecasting in research division of top-tier investment bank (recently published in top think-tank journal). Teaching Experience: 1 year leading ug micro theory tutorials during mphil. LORs: 3 econ profs, all fairly well published. Interests: international, macro, industrial org, applied econometrics; pretty much anything other than micro theory. Other: 23 yo international male; currently working as research associate in economics for i-bank, directly under former economics professor (now uk chief economist). Admissions Decisions In (and attending): NYU Stern (Econ PhD) Out: Harvard, Yale, Berkeley, Stanford, MIT, Penn, Duke, Columbia, Northwestern, Chicago, Princeton, UCLA Moral of the story: Be careful who writes your recs. I got a rec from a very famous mathematical economist professor that did (and probably could) not say I was outstanding. i did so in order to make up for a somewhat deficient math background (i.e. no analysis). i confirmed this with Stern who said that my recs (they only needed the other two) were outstanding. A mediocre rec is a real problem if you are only applying to top schools. (Note that I didnt apply to any more safeties as my outside option was a fully-funded dphil at oxford). If I could do it all again I would get a rec from someone that was ridiculously positive even if this person was unknown/junior. that said, i am very happy with the Stern admit and the ball is very much in my court now. in addition, i probably wouldnt waste so much time on this blog worrying that i dont have topographanalysis on my transcript. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zoethor2 Posted April 12, 2007 Share Posted April 12, 2007 PROFILE: Type of Undergrad: Large public state university, no reputation in economics or mathematics. I will be the 3rd graduate ever from the economics department to pursue a PhD in Economics. Undergrad GPA: 3.93 overall, 4.0 economics, 3.85 math Type of Grad: N/A Grad GPA: N/A GRE: 780Q, 660V, 4.5A Math Courses: Intro Calc, Intro and Theoretical Linear Algebra, Intro Proofs sequence, 2 semester Theoretical Stats sequence, 2 semester Real Analysis sequence, Theoretical Complex Variables, Intro to DiffE Econ Courses: Intro and Advanced Econometrics, Intro and Intermediate Macro and Micro, Managerial, Monetary, International Trade, Experimental (Game Theory), 6 Independent Studies doing my own research (fun!) Other Courses: Majored in Psych, also, so a whole slew of those, but I doubt they hugely impacted my application. Letters of Recommendation: Very strong, but by relatively unknown professors. Two econ, one math. Research Experience: Did about 6 independent (though overseen by faculty) pieces of research, each culminating in a paper. 2 in experimental economics, several in economics of education, and one in game theory and conflict situations. Each paper was presented at a professional conference, mostly in non-student sessions. Teaching Experience: Was a TA for Johns Hopkins CTY for 2 summers for the Probability and Game Theory course. Research Interests: applied microeconomics/econometrics, experimental economics, economics of education SOP: I think it was reasonably strong. My advisors and I revised it quite a bit. Other: Triple-majored in economics, mathematics, and psychology. This meant a lot of semesters with 6 courses, as well as taking me 5 years to graduate. RESULTS: Acceptances: U of Maryland (no funding), UCLA (no funding), U Michigan (no funding), Georgetown (funded), Boston College (funded), CMU's Decision Science PhD (funded) Waitlists: Rejections: MIT, UPenn, Stanford, UC Berkeley, Caltech, Princeton, NYU (presumably), UPitt (presumably), GMU (presumably) (Presumably = I still haven't heard either way from these schools as of 4/12.) What would you have done differently? I would have applied to more schools in the top 20. When all my results were in, I was choosing between unfunded offers from top 20 schools and funded offers from schools ranked below 40. I wish I had looked into and applied to more schools in the 10-30 range, where it seems I could've performed well. As I said, pretty much no one from my school has applied to graduate programs before, so I had very little information to go on as far as my chances at top programs. Overall, though, I'm ecstatic about my results. I was expecting to get into GMU, UPitt, BC and maybe one other school. Getting into UMD, UCLA, UMich was a fantastic surprise. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
anothereconstudent Posted April 12, 2007 Share Posted April 12, 2007 PROFILE: Type of Undergrad: Top 50 research University with unknown econ dept. Undergrad GPA: 3.97 cumulative Type of Grad: Straight from undergrad Grad GPA: N/A GRE: 780Q, 690V, 5.5AWA Math Courses: Calc I-III (A/A/B+), Linear Algebra (A-), Diff EQ (A), Time Series & Spatial Analysis (A), Prob & stats (A-), Real Analysis (current) Econ Courses: Intermediate Micro/Macro, Adv Micro, about 12 subject courses and econometrics. (4.0) Letters of Recommendation: Econ profs - senior thesis advisor, 2 profs I had TA'd for and had in at least 2 classes. They were pretty strong. Research Experience: Senior thesis, research assignments at work Teaching Experience: TA for Intro Micro/Macro Research Interests: Applied Micro, applied IO SOP: Fairly generic Other: Won award for best thesis, best econ student. Extensive programming experience in SAS and stata. Economics-related job. RESULTS: Acceptances: UIUC (attending) OSU Georgetown all funded Rejections: MIT Berkeley Chicago Columbia Northwestern Maryland UT Austin What would you have done differently? Applied to more schools, especially schools in the 5-20 range. Taken real analysis sooner. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
anukriti Posted April 12, 2007 Share Posted April 12, 2007 Type of Undergrad: Masters in Economics from the best economics department in my country...history of students being accepted to Top 10 universities every year. Undergrad GPA: 69%. Ranked 3rd in my class. GRE: 800Q, 570V, 4.5 W Math Courses: Undergrad Math: Linear Algebra , Differential Equations, Topology, Real Analysis, Statistics, Partial Differential Equations, Game Theory, Calculus Econ Courses: M.A.Econ: Microeconomic Theory, Advanced Macroeconomic Theory, Basic and advanced Econometrics, Public Economics, International Trade, Forecasting Methods and applications, Economics of Regulation, Applied Consumption Analysis, Comparative Development Letters of Recommendation: All economics professors with Ph.D.'s from Yale, Cornell, Princeton. One of them working in a leading research institute in the US now. Research Experience: One year research with an international research organization in DC. Teaching Experience: Undergraduate Statistics for one year. Research Interests: Development, Health, Education RESULTS: Acceptances: Columbia Rochester Maryland Brown Wisconsin Waitlisted NYU Rejections: Princeton Harvard MIT Yale Cornell UPENN What would you have done differently? Nothing actually. I tried my best! http://www.www.urch.com/forums/tm_images/statusicon/user_offline.gif http://www.www.urch.com/forums/tm_images/buttons/reputation.gif vbrep_register("442973") http://www.www.urch.com/forums/tm_images/buttons/report.gif Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mobil Posted April 14, 2007 Share Posted April 14, 2007 Profile: GRE: 800Q/520V/3.5A TOEFL: 263/300, 4.5/6.0 GPA: I don't know how to translate: Undergraduate: 8.7/10 Master: 8.13/10 Classes: Math: Undergrad: Calculus I-II, Static Optimization, Lin Algebra, Int to Probability and Statistics. Grad: Real Analysis, Dynamic Optimization, Probability and Statistics Econ: Lots of undergrad, core grad sequence in Micro, Macro and Econometrics Electives: Money Theory, Development Economics, Advanced Theory Type of Undergrad: International Research Experience: Master's thesis Teaching Experience: TA for two grad Macro LORs: 5 LORs from professors who are based here in my home country. 3 are tenured professors (PhDs from Berkeley, Minnesota and UPenn) and two more junior (PhD from Chicago, PhD from a domestic university). SoP & Interests: It was just about my academic history, research interests (emphasizing the field in which each university is best) and professors I could work with in each of the universities. Other: International, Latin American, 25 yo. Interests: Macroeconomics, Money Theory, Development Economics RESULTS: Acceptances: (with funding): NYU Minnesota Columbia PennState (no funding): Rochester Rejections: Princeton UPenn Northwestern Yale No answer at all: Toronto What would you have done differently? Nothing, I guess... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peterB Posted April 14, 2007 Share Posted April 14, 2007 PROFILE: Type of Undergrad: Top public univeristy, excellent econ dept. Undergrad GPA: 3.1; 3.95 continuing ed. program Type of Grad: Grad GPA: GRE: math 780 verbal 780 Math Courses: stat and probability, real analysis, calc II and III, linear algebra Econ Courses: inter'l trade, monetary econ., 20th century econ. history, development economics, history of development economics, econometrics Other Courses: Letters of Recommendation: 2 econ people and one poli sci prof, no big names. Two of them knew me very well, and this must have helped a lot. Research Experience: summer RA Teaching Experience: Research Interests: development, IO, applied micro SOP: explained the circumstances for my low GPA, other than that pretty standard Other: RESULTS: Acceptances: UT, BU, Davis, UCLA, Riverside, Penn State Waitlists: Rejections: lots, NYU, Columbia, Stanford, Berkeley ARE, UCSD, U Mich, Cornell What would you have done differently? If I had more time and money, I would have taken a grad-level micro course. Overall I feel really lucky to be in at UCLA; anyone else headed there? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SMH Posted April 14, 2007 Share Posted April 14, 2007 Type of Undergrad: No one knows my university outside my country (which is a third world country). Undergrad GPA: 3.78; Econ:3.81, Math:4.0 GRE: Quant : 800, Verbal : 570, AWA : 5.0 Math Courses: Cal 1-3 (A/A+/A), linear(A),prob(A),stats(A), ODEs(A), numerical solutions to ODEs (A+), Partial diff eqs (A+), Discrete Maths (A+), Quantitative and Computational finance(A) Econ Courses: inter'l finance, monetary econ., dynamic econ,dev econ,IPE,econometrics1-2, Applied econ, macroeconomic analysis, public econ, (apart from all the regular micros and macros and a couple more) Recommendation: 2 econ people and one math prof, no big names. i know all of them were full of praise for me in their letters like they are for everyone else Research Experience: RA for a year Teaching Experience: TA for ODEs, stats, elementary formal logic, microeconomic-II, econometrics & research methodology (grad level course) Research Interests: econometrics SOP: nothing special Other: a substantial part of my CV and personal statement was only to show my achievements in sports, i know it doesnt count much but i cudnt just leave it out RESULTS: Acceptances: UVA, Rice, Rochester, Wisconsin-Madison, UNC (UNC funded from univ, rest funded via a scholarship) Waitlists: Rejections: Harvard, Yale, Chicago (did not hear from U florida and ohio state) What would you have done differently? if the econ dep at my univ had not made it mendatory for us to take stupid univ core courses (50 units of that) in SS like politics and sociology then i wud have taken courses like real analysis and functional analysis overall it was pretty difficult to choose between wisconsin and rochester first and then after that i got a funded offer from UNC so another difficult decision, but i wud probably stick to my original decision of going to rochester Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EconCandidate Posted April 14, 2007 Share Posted April 14, 2007 PROFILE: Type of Undergrad: Small, relatively unknown private university in the northeast. Undergrad GPA: 3.65 (3.83 in Econ and Math) GRE: 800Q/550V/4.0A Math Courses: Intro Calc (A), Calc of Single Variable I (A-), Calc of Single Variable II (A-), Calc of Several Variables (A-), Integral Calc and Differential Equations (A), Linear Algebra (A-), Numerical Analysis (A-), Advanced Calculus (A), Intro to Real Analysis (A), Math Stats and Probability I (A), Math Stats and Probability II (In Progress) Econ Courses: Honors Principles of Micro (A), Honors Principles of Macro (A), International (B+), Money & Banking (A), Intermediate Micro (A), Intermediate Macro (A), Law & Economics (B+), Public Finance (A-), Game Theory (A), Econometrics (In Progress), Advanced Public Policy Thesis (In Progress) Letters of Recommendation: From 3 professors who knew me extremely well. I can't imagine they could have been any stronger. Research Experience: Completed a summer research project about the term structure of interest rates. Currently working on a senior thesis about funding for public education. Teaching Experience: Certified Level III Tutor. Math and Econ tutoring experience. Teaching Assistant for Intro Calc and Calculus of a Single Variable II. Research Interests: Public Finance, Game Theory, Applied Micro. SOP: Discussed my math preparation, research project, teaching/tutoring experience and my goals. RESULTS: Acceptances: University of Wisconsin-Madison ($) (Attending) University of Virginia ($) Waitlists: Boston College Rejections: University of Chicago Yale University Northwestern University University of Michigan-Ann Arbor University of Minnesota-Twin Cities University of Rochester Duke University University of Maryland-College Park Brown University The Ohio State University University of Illinois-Urbana Champaign What would you have done differently? My experience suggests that this process is incredibly random. I ended up with funding at a program that is clearly top 12- top 15, and got rejected outright by many programs that were not ranked as highly. Don't rule out any programs that you have been admitted to, because you never know what can happen, even at the last minute! Overall, I should have tried to improve my overall undergradaute GPA and scores on the other sections of the GRE, because coming from an unknown university probably hurt my applications some. Additionally, I would have tried to complete more research as an undergrad. A combination of these factors might have made my applications considerably less random. The best advice I can give people is that a high GPA, high GRE Math, and an extensive math background are the norm for applicants, and they are minimum preparation to be an appealing candidate. These do not seperate you from the pack any more. In the end though, no regrets at all. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
macrotime Posted April 15, 2007 Share Posted April 15, 2007 PROFILE: Type of Undergrad: Third world country (unknown to most) Undergrad GPA: 76/100 (math 90/100) Type of Grad: Third world country (well known top program) Grad GPA: 6/7 GRE: 780Q/500V/4.5A Math Courses: Calculus, Linear algebra, ODE, Dynamic prog., optimization, probability, econometrics Econ Courses: micro, macro, just as many courses an econ major should take Letters of Recommendation: 1 (MIT), 2 (NYU), 1 (Duke), 1 (UCLA) all of them really strong. 4 of them publish or have published in top journals, one less known. Research Experience: 2 years as an RA in a well known research institute, 2 years working in an interntional organization but in a more policy oriented position Teaching Experience: TA ecometrics grad level, TA international macroeconomics, instructor undergard macro, TA while undergrad macro, an intro courses to economics Research Interests: Macro, econometrics SOP: Honest, just described my research interests Other: RESULTS: Acceptances: Duke ($$) Georgetown (no $$) Rochester ($$) Waitlists: NYU Rejections: MIT Harvard Northwestern Columbia BU What would you have done differently? First, I would have resaerched more the universities I wanted to apply. Probably, that would have led me to apply to other set of universities. I would have worked less, and I would have taken more math classes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.