spartacuss

Man it can be C, but they should formulate it far better, not to guess here what author dream to be true ! If author wish C as answer he or she whould offer something like this : The investment happen to be not better, in terms of interst rate, than the assets hit by invflation ! not the best investment available - wrong term, because you should invest in house the year before, in order to enjoy inflated value, so it is not investment available, but investment available the year before, when nobody knows what will happen for one year ! That is why people invest always in the best possible investment, because they are not Nostradamus !

Answer can be E only ! In C , it claims that this is not the best investment, but actually it is , because it was, before inflation, so now it need not to remain the best, but we don't know that , and we have no right to guess ! But what we know is actually E, that something happened and the best among us is a looser, so all other are bigger loosers, and the best is still the best, or in this case the looser with minimal loss ! We know this ! We have right to say this on this way ! Anyway , not good offers for pick up the answer !

Answer is B ! only supported completely ! left-handed persons contract viruses, such as influenza, more frequently than do right-handed persons A not explicitely stated, we have no right to guess weater or not is true ! C completely wrong, need not to be a painter at all ! D we have no this information, we have no right to guess, maybe entire population is left handed... E not supported, out of scope, irrelevant

Answer is B ! In B - related to work, clear, concise !!! In D - to general, out of scope ! In A - they will probably find some other excuse , when they become healthy in order not to be productive !

Answer is A ! B is not under the criteria C is ok, but A is stronger under the criteria, C is second best answer !

obviously D undermine argument by stating that stress is problem , not alcohol ! In C, proposal is just weakened, but it didn't undermine argument, because it can be small part of drinking workers, and reaction of few among them, this will not kill the idea, even if it is true that some of them will react contraproductively ! If D is, it will kill the idea by stating that shell game is the couse of wrong perception among the management of the company !!!

answer is A ! Only correct option ! In sentence 4. their growing pension liabilities, leading : INCORRECT because it change the meaning : It means that governments do some things leading politicians thorughout...!!! Also their growing liabilities is quite awkward and incorrect

Answer is D, everything is ok with D ! In A it should be necessary that - that predicted THAT processes... so it can be A that predicted that or , here we have no that !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! D that predicted a and b to undermine

second passage : 1 c 2 d 3 b

passage I 1.A 2.B it is about innovation , not about growth therefore key word: Peter Senge (10) and Goran Carstedt see this development as laudable but suggest that simply adopting ecoefficiency innovations could actually worsen environmental (15) stresses in the future. Such innovations reduce production waste but do not alter the number of products manufactured nor the waste generated from (20) their use and discard you see your wrong word : Moreover, there is (25) no guarantee that increased economic growth from ecoefficiency will come in similarly ecoefficient ways, since in today’s global markets, (30) greater profits may be turned into investment capital that could easily be reinvested in old-style eco-inefficient industries"

This is not good cr, since Lilly never said that government will ouweight, just that she has different view !!!!! Answer therefore should be B ! Also should be changed to mean - she offred her view, that will be enough...not this general statement !!! We have no rights to cliam something not stated explicitly, E and D therefore can't hold !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

C- can't solve paradox = less time per patient per each visit, and in the same time more average time per patient E - resolve - they want more payed particular visits, in less time = less spent time per visit, more average time spent per patient, because of desired repeated visits !

can't be they, it can only be Foreign cheese, it can't be even it, because than it will mean taste of cheese, but we talk about foreign cheese, therefore they must be - foreign cheese !!! Fistat sentence statest that cheese is singular !!!

Boys you didn't catch it ! If they work 10 plus years than they should have lower prices , because experience will compensate ! so offer B actually strengthen the executive's logic ! In E it claims that this newspaper is not comparable to any other, that it is more valuable, exclusive, international, and therefore their employees deserve to be highly payed professionals, not an average payed journalist in the industry !!! answer is E, clearly !

1.D parrallel was -was, all other are awkward !!! 2. A all is clear and ok in this sentence, clear and concise !!!