spartacuss

Man it can be C, but they should formulate it far better, not to guess here what author dream to be true ! If author wish C as answer he or she whould offer something like this : The investment happen to be not better, in terms of interst rate, than the assets hit by invflation ! not the best investment available - wrong term, because you should invest in house the year before, in order to enjoy inflated value, so it is not investment available, but investment available the year before, when nobody knows what will happen for one year ! That is why people invest always in the best possible investment, because they are not Nostradamus !

Answer can be E only ! In C , it claims that this is not the best investment, but actually it is , because it was, before inflation, so now it need not to remain the best, but we don't know that , and we have no right to guess ! But what we know is actually E, that something happened and the best among us is a looser, so all other are bigger loosers, and the best is still the best, or in this case the looser with minimal loss ! We know this ! We have right to say this on this way ! Anyway , not good offers for pick up the answer !

Answer is B ! only supported completely ! left-handed persons contract viruses, such as influenza, more frequently than do right-handed persons A not explicitely stated, we have no right to guess weater or not is true ! C completely wrong, need not to be a painter at all ! D we have no this information, we have no right to guess, maybe entire population is left handed... E not supported, out of scope, irrelevant

Answer is B ! In B - related to work, clear, concise !!! In D - to general, out of scope ! In A - they will probably find some other excuse , when they become healthy in order not to be productive !

Answer is A ! B is not under the criteria C is ok, but A is stronger under the criteria, C is second best answer !

obviously D undermine argument by stating that stress is problem , not alcohol ! In C, proposal is just weakened, but it didn't undermine argument, because it can be small part of drinking workers, and reaction of few among them, this will not kill the idea, even if it is true that some of them will react contraproductively ! If D is, it will kill the idea by stating that shell game is the couse of wrong perception among the management of the company !!!

answer is A ! Only correct option ! In sentence 4. their growing pension liabilities, leading : INCORRECT because it change the meaning : It means that governments do some things leading politicians thorughout...!!! Also their growing liabilities is quite awkward and incorrect

Answer is D, everything is ok with D ! In A it should be necessary that - that predicted THAT processes... so it can be A that predicted that or , here we have no that !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! D that predicted a and b to undermine

second passage : 1 c 2 d 3 b

passage I 1.A 2.B it is about innovation , not about growth therefore key word: Peter Senge (10) and Goran Carstedt see this development as laudable but suggest that simply adopting ecoefficiency innovations could actually worsen environmental (15) stresses in the future. Such innovations reduce production waste but do not alter the number of products manufactured nor the waste generated from (20) their use and discard you see your wrong word : Moreover, there is (25) no guarantee that increased economic growth from ecoefficiency will come in similarly ecoefficient ways, since in today’s global markets, (30) greater profits may be turned into investment capital that could easily be reinvested in old-style eco-inefficient industries"

This is not good cr, since Lilly never said that government will ouweight, just that she has different view !!!!! Answer therefore should be B ! Also should be changed to mean - she offred her view, that will be enough...not this general statement !!! We have no rights to cliam something not stated explicitly, E and D therefore can't hold !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

C- can't solve paradox = less time per patient per each visit, and in the same time more average time per patient E - resolve - they want more payed particular visits, in less time = less spent time per visit, more average time spent per patient, because of desired repeated visits !

can't be they, it can only be Foreign cheese, it can't be even it, because than it will mean taste of cheese, but we talk about foreign cheese, therefore they must be - foreign cheese !!! Fistat sentence statest that cheese is singular !!!

Boys you didn't catch it ! If they work 10 plus years than they should have lower prices , because experience will compensate ! so offer B actually strengthen the executive's logic ! In E it claims that this newspaper is not comparable to any other, that it is more valuable, exclusive, international, and therefore their employees deserve to be highly payed professionals, not an average payed journalist in the industry !!! answer is E, clearly !

1.D parrallel was -was, all other are awkward !!! 2. A all is clear and ok in this sentence, clear and concise !!!

E is far better ! A can be true, but it is quite inconvinient. We always choose better answer, E is better and quite correct, also comma is necessary in this sentence !!!!!!!!!!!!!!

E - sound can't prevent itself alone , but water prevent sound !!! so only C is correct !!!

E - argument can only be true if this is true, is the US is important world user, than if you curb important user, you curbed the entire whole ! This is the same as Lebron James in Cleveland. What is Lebron for Cleveland - main and the most important contributor. So, the US is Lebron of this world. Curb the US, you curbed the world ! A - it is not enough pertinent to our needed conclusion ! who cares, this can only strengthen argument, but can't be assumption ! C - it can be possible that US use only 1 % of world resources, and in the same time remains the leader in resource consumption. You ask HOW ? Simple : All other countries use together 99 % China is number two with 0.5 % world consumption all other countries consume less than China there are more than 200 hundred countries in this world this calculation is possible, because it is not stated in the passage, and we can conclude this remember : EVERYTHING WHAT IS NOT EXPLICITELY STATED AND IMPLIED CAN'T AND NEED NOT TO BE TRUE ! ------------------------------------------------------- Even if it is true in real life, this GMAT boys ! GMAT is like the law, everyone is innocent , unless proven guilty, and can enjoy his or her first amandment rights ! This mean that if you kill a man, and there is no proven evidence, just assumptions or predictions, you are innocent. Someone else will say, this is not fair, but also the GMAT is not fair, life is not fair...answers A and C declared wrong is not fair...answer E declared correct is not fair... ------------------------------------------- Here answer is E, even though this example has no direct support with my green comment, because in practice and in real life this holds truth that the US is important global player in everything !

word quality here can be better defined to imply , succes rate , ratio delivered/lost D is answer !

A. histidine is found in all parts of the plant—roots, stem, leaves, and flowers - this can be answer since all parts are vital for plant to survive and thrive, and reproduce !!!!!!!!!!!!!! B. the herb’s high level of histidine production is found to be associated with an unusually low level of production of other amino acids not pertinent C. others of the closely related group of plants are also found to produce histidine in large quantities we don't talk about others and histine, but about connection on relation histine-metal inertion D. cultivation of the herb in soil with high concentrations of the metals will, over an extended period, make the soil suitable for plants to which the metals are toxic too broad in conclusion, too far away... E. the concentration of histidine in the growing herb declines as the plant approaches maturity out of scope

1.C is answer ! never we can infer great numbers, we don't talk about numbers at all !!! 2. E

explanation : If they are not different bacuse of different places for a living , than they are different naturally, despite the fact that they are born in the same horoscopic sign. It means that horoscopic sign don't determine personality, but genetical structure on its own !

there is no contrast here so answer id D ! also look in previous pages for this question, where it was posted that OA is D ! now it appears wrongly that OA is C, but C doesn't make sense at all, because there is no contrast here, just pure facts !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

you necessary need , comma here !!!!!!!!!!!! historians, in writing about it, inevitably reflect...than E can be, without this , only option d has sense , dispite awkwardness !!!

it is the only answer that makes sense ... (B) since these families can no longer afford to buy homes, furthermore correct , it is the same stream of thought !!! © for these families can no longer afford to buy homes, yet incorrect, yet is quite wrong for the same stream of thought , there is no contraction in thought at all !!!!!!!