Search the Community

Q) Being a celebrity such as famous film star or sports personality – brings problems as well as benefits. Do you think that being a celebrity brings more benefits or problems? Ans) Celebrities are most popular icons in the world. Getting a celebrity status is not an easy job. The person who achieves highest level among all people by hard work known as celebrity. Undoubtedly, the famous people have gained lots of benefits that common man doesn’t gain. Although, some society individuals think that famousness brings lot of downsides to the people, I believe that it brings innumerable number if benefits such as money and social status. Celebrities are gaining lots of money in and around the work. They can earn lots of money with less amount of period compared to common people who are living in community. For example, Dhoni, A famous and popular Indian cricketer has gained 20000000 dollars money for an advertisement that he acted for a famous worldwide company. This was happened because of his fame in sports. This amount is not equivalent to a common school teacher whose pay is far less than him. It is clear that being a celebrity would have positive effect in their life and this is one of the two reasons that person can get as a celebrity. High level social status, the celebrities has acquired than a normal people. Celebrities are role models, they can motivate the people towards their success. For Instance, Amitabh Bachan, A famous well known person and popular Indian star has gained high status, by administrating a lot of shows and involved in many social activities. In conclusion, celebrities such as famous people have a lot of benefits such as economically sound and high level status. Therefore, I strongly believe that, being a famous personality people has got immense amount of advantages than a drawbacks. It is better said that if celebrity spends the money towards society growth.

Topic: Some people feel that the design of newly constructed buildings in big cities should be controlled by governments. Others contest those who finance the construction of a building should be free to design it as they see fit. What is your position? Discuss both sides in your response. Essay: In today’s worlds, demand of better infrastructure is becoming basic need / base of big cities. To fulfill this growing need of cities, there are lots of new constructions happening. Few of very common building requirements are office space, residential space, shopping complex, government building etc. Control over design of these new building is becoming major area to look after. Some argue that this should be controlled by government officials and some are in favor of building financers. Both side of this argument will be analyzed before a reasoned conclusion is drawn. Firstly it is very genuine to say investors of the building have all the right to decide the architecture of building as they are the owner / sole body. They might have certain ambition or thought on how they want to design their building and by allowing them to design their own architecture they might create something on which everyone can proud. For instance, take a case of Burge Dubai. It was designed by financers of the project and now it turned up one of the wonder on which Dubai people can proud off. Because of this it is easy to see why the argument that financers should be free to design their own project has garnered support. However on the other side of the argument it must be remembered that every government is responsible to protect environment, provide safety to general public and decide on some general rules and regulation that need to adhere by all individuals, organization or private body. The same goes to designing buildings. It has been seen in some area that when government didn’t controlled the design of the building it caused disasters. For example, Florida being a hurricane prone zone builders are not allowed to build skyscrapers. They must use wood instead of concrete to build flats or house for general public. This provides general public safety in case of hurricane or tornado situation. Unfortunately all financers might aware with all the geographical or environment needs while designing their building. Thus this makes it clear why the argument that government must control all building design supported by most. In summary, both sides of argument regarding the control of building design in big cities have strong support. However after analyzing both camps it is clear that the idea of giving sole control in the hand of financers cannot be supported. As such, it is predicted that the negative aspects of the debate over giving control to financers of building will be forever be stronger than the positive ones and because of this government must control the design aspects of building in big cities.