Shooter

I want the T-shirt

I get A. (I) defective = 3x;non defective = 500x => prob = 3x/3x+500x (II) INUSFF

I get B. (I) INSUFF (II) 13!+2 ......2 is a factor 13!+3 ......3 is a factor . . 13!+13.......13 is a factor

C should be the answer. To prove that s = 3r+2 ; we need both the statements.

I get C. cm+pm=50 cn+pn=60 (I) cm=cn=c 50-pm = 60-pn INSUFF (II) pm=pn+10 INSUFF (I)+(II) we can find pn; hence we can find c.

A is good. A. in converting harvested trees into wood products may reduce harvest rates, it will stimulate demand by increasing supply and lowering prices, thereby boosting. B. In converting harvested trees into wood products may reduce harvest rates, demand will be stimulated because of increasing supply and lowering prices, which boost. Wrong usage of 'which' C. Of converting harvested trees into wood products may reduce harvest rates, it will stimulate demand by increasing supply and lowering prices, which boosts. Wrong usage of 'which' D. Of harvested trees being converted into wood products may reduce harvest rates, it will stimulate demand, because it will increase supply and lower prices, thereby boosting. 'being' gives meaning that it is undergoing E. When harvested trees are converted into wood products may reduce harvest rates, demand will be stimulated because of increasing supplyand lowering prices, which boost. Wrong usage of 'which'

Although improved efficiency in converting harvested trees into wood products may reduce harvest rates, it will stimulate demand by increasing supply and lowering prices, thereby boosting consumption. A. in converting harvested trees into wood products may reduce harvest rates, it will stimulate demand by increasing supply and lowering prices, thereby boosting. B. In converting harvested trees into wood products may reduce harvest rates, demand will be stimulated because of increasing supply and lowering prices, which boost. C. Of converting harvested trees into wood products may reduce harvest rates, it will stimulate demand by increasing supply and lowering prices, which boosts. D. Of harvested trees being converted into wood products may reduce harvest rates, it will stimulate demand, because it will increase supply and lower prices, thereby boosting. E. When harvested trees are converted into wood products may reduce harvest rates, demand will be stimulated because of increasing supply and lowering prices, which boost.

I guess C makes more sense. I discarded B for bearing 'some'. May be 'some' is less than 1%, which will not make any diff. In C, they are telling that all the trainees are given minimum wage and need to increase their salary after they are trained. Currently all the trainees are receiving 5 and might receive 5.5 after training but now they need to receive 5.5 at training and need an increase after training. This is hurting the conclusion: its impact on wages will probably be negligible

I'll take E. We need to find a +ve factor for comparing with competitors. I think E is not giving any advantage but it not hurting either when compared to other options. (A) Comparisons with competitors are most likely to focus on practices that the manager making the comparisons already employs. Comparing with competitors = redo the work (B) Getting “inside” information about the unique practices of competitors is particularly difficult. Getting info is tough hence not preferable © Since companies that compete with each other are likely to have comparable levels of efficiency, only benchmarking against noncompetitors is likely to reveal practices that would aid in beating competitors. Straight FWD (D) Managers are generally more receptive to new ideas that they find outside their own industry. Managers like ideas from non-competitors (E) Much of the success of good companies is due to their adoption of practices that take advantage of the special circumstances of their products or markets.

If I were you, I would pick a value from the choices and will start calculating for the correct value.

Now I understand, Line need not be diagonal to cut into 2 equal parts. Thanks genius, I dunno I am making lot of silly mistakes now a days.

Cartman, When I graph the points, I dont find a feasible line which passes through the origin and also passes as diagonal to the given parallelogram. If the line is a diagonal then the slope must be 1-0/3-1 = 1/2. Why do we need to divide by one more 2?

Cartman, Why isnt it 45,45,90? All the angles of the rectangle are 90 and havent the diagonals bisects them?

All the numbers are around 100. Hence the sqrt(100) = 10. So the product of diff prime numbers should be less than 10. 99 = 3*11 98 = 2*7 97 = 97 96 =3*2 (less than 10) Hence 96

5!/3! ways.