I would say the actual GMAT is best mirrored by the harder OG questions - the thinking patterns are just a little different in Kaplan. But the Kaplan strategies are sometimes better than official OG explanations, e.g. using backsolving or number picking instead of a more conventional approach.Originally posted by jjomalls
Do you feel that your quant questions from the real test mirrored the harder OG questions, or more so the Kaplan questions?
I took the test and scored a 640 the first time. My verbal's not the issue, just the math. Have 4 weeks to go, and am working both Kaplan and OG. Not sure where/how to focus the best, especially on probability, comb/perm, and exponent questions. Any suggestions?
I believe that earlier editions of OG had questions divided by difficulty, but now they're all mixed together. Based on my own experience, though, difficult questions occurred more frequently in the last 80 PS questions - from #361 on, I missed 1 in 10 on my first attempt, while on the 80 questions just before that I didn't miss a single one. Similarly, in the final 50 questions in the OG DS section I missed or was slow or unsure for 2 in 10 questions, while for the rest of DS my average miss rate was about 1 in 10.
I think comb/perm is freaking a lot of people out unnecessarily. I only had one combinations question where it really helped to know the xCy formula (the number of ways to choose y elements from a set of x elements). On a second comb/perm question, the trick was more to translate the word problem into a comb/perm concept - the actual answer was small enough that I could have just enumerated the possible outcomes. For probabilities, just the basics were sufficient - nothing beyond what's covered in the math review that's in the beginning of OG.
My feeling is that you are far more likely to need solid arithmetic and algebra skills (including exponents) than esoteric comb/perm/probabilities.


LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks











Bookmarks