-
Posts
367 -
Joined
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Events
Everything posted by mathdumber
-
I am for A - right idiom and parallel is expected to make an offer to buy First Interstate Bank until a merger agreement is signed that includes a provision for penalties if the deal were
-
I think it is B C,D & E -wrong modifier the usage of Although should have subject + verb +Object
-
Poor people, who already purchase the cheapest food
mathdumber replied to hadi98's topic in GMAT Sentence Correction
IMO E i think "items on which" did not make sense -
I would take A In C, i think the number of truck is singular, so the usage of themselves is wrong....(unless themselves modifies "a total of 469,000 cars and trucks") I dunno in D for some reason i think themselves doesn't make sense to me (i am more likely wrong tho) What is the OA?
-
I would choose C as well the THEIR just don't sound right tho Couldn't it be referring to "Repuplican" or "Conservation Christians"? but in other choices "it" is even worst i think....
-
I am for E also right comparison
-
Either A or D not sure
-
I am also for A agree with Anil and ontheway
-
I think it is B i think the argument assumes that the Japan and Western Europ would just buy the stuff coz of the cheap price regardless OA???
-
I also go for B i think Rather than shows a preference over sth
-
I would pick A as well In B it doesn't clarify what type of deficity it is OA???
-
Another Vote for E So x that y in other choice the idioms are wrong (so x such that y or such that ) i think B distorted the original meaning
-
hey blissgmat could you post the OA???? Pleaseeee
-
2 interesting CR's - please explain your answers
mathdumber replied to mindgod's topic in GMAT Critical Reasoning
1. B 2. B I picked B because it means that the number of smokers has not been reduced since the program was implemented. I eliminated C because students do not neccessarily need to be smoking while they are off campus. OA PLS? -
ha interesting it seems like GMAT writer like to copy the questions all over from the newspaper to a single little software descrption hahaha j/k
-
I am really bad at this sort of question, pls help
mathdumber replied to praguish's topic in GMAT Critical Reasoning
@powerthelogic i got a little confused with your explanation at first. but after i sort out all the stuff on your post, i understand the logic of the answer now. (it did take me a little bit :) ) I really appreciate your patience. thanks a lot! -
I am also for 1 agree with gmatprepison
-
My pick is D also agree with the above explanation OA?
-
I am really bad at this sort of question, pls help
mathdumber replied to praguish's topic in GMAT Critical Reasoning
Can anybody explain further with answer choice A, B, C and D pls?? i still dun really understand them after i read teh posts these answer choice makes me feel dizzy... -
D may be???? whether the mail man lost/delayed more letters are lost or delayed at the same time that more are delivered is related to the quality of service......
-
Dang! crazy question! E may be??? I feel like the argument keep going back to the beginning point --> TODAY and Tomorrow in the same event... Not really sure how to explain...
-
I also Chose E. i do not think that the argument appealed to authority Not really sure OA?
-
I think it is B coz he did "Oh yeah" right away, so he just showed another usage of "yeah" and pointed out the inconsistency on professor thesis. (Not sure tho)
-
Is the question asking for the answer choice that is not an appropriate objection to the argument?? If so, IMO C (NOT SURE THO) the following is my reasoning: A) the argument did not define "severe punishment". What could be severe punishment to me mightnot be a severe punishment to you. e.g. if severe punishment means beating your kids brutally to death, i would strongly object the argument. IN THE OTHER SIDE, if severe punishment means to only take away the kids most favorite things, then i will just approve the punishment right away B.) the same reasoning as A. What do you mean by BAD? getting in a fight could be bad or not washing dishes could be bad. D) The premise said that u need to punish ur child who is bad. conclusion said that u need to punish ur child because ur child has been bad before. ur child could have been good now and it doesnt mean that your child is gonna be a criminal, and the premise did not ask you to punish your child if you child is good. E.) the same reasoning as B & A OA pls?
-
agree with others with answer A, B and E between C and D, I picked C coz it is more parallel What is the OA?