Jump to content
Urch Forums

Get your IELTS essay checked and graded for free


ielts-blog

Recommended Posts

Good afternoon,

Could someone specialised in the IELTS exam be so kind in order to grade my essay?

 

The topic sounds like that:

,,Universities should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject.

To what extent do you agree or disagree?,,

 

Nowadays, more and more people are concerned about themes like social equality, discrimination and, more important, the ways to reconciliate such manifestations.

I think we should look into the past first. In ancient times, only man had acces to education, and this because man had the phyzical power back then. I consider this to be one of the biggest mistakes human kind had ever made, so let s not repeat it! In consequence, I trully believe that there should not exist any difference in the criteria of acceptance cor females and males, not only at a university, but everywhere.

On the other hand, accepting equal numbers of females and males at the university and having fair criteria of admission are two totally different things. I say that because a fair selection is a selection with ni discriminations from either males or females. In orther to do that, the better prepared people should be accepted, let s say, at the university, even if this means that all of them are male or female.

Another opinion is that females should have a larger number of places at the university than males in order to compensate the delay the had in the past and encourage them for the future.

In conclusion, I believe that the fairness which should characterize the admission process at an academic institution should be related to the past performances, not to the race, gender or any other things.

 

 

Thankyou in advance!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • Replies 53
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Topic: Nowadays more and more young people hold the important positions in the government. Some people think that it is a good thingwhile others argue that it is not suitable. Discuss both these views and give your opinion.

 

There is an increasing trend that young people are holding many vital positions in the authority. While it can be argued that this is a negative tendency, I believe that the benefits would outweigh the drawbacks.

 

There are several reasons why people saying that young people holding important positions is detrimental. The young people are often assumed that do not have many experiences and understanding as the elderly. Sometimes they can not hold their temper and will have elated decisions, which may affect the whole system. Since politics is a complex environment that requires those involved to have ingenious management over circumstances. This is something that the young ones lack of and need more time to watch-and-learn.

 

Despite the argument above, I believe that young politicians' contributions will have more of beneficial impacts. Firstly, this workforce will be newly graduated, their knowledge are up-to-date and their ideas are close to the needs of young generation citizens. Secondly, these young people will still have a whole future ahead so that they can follow and be responsible for their long-term projects or ideas, while the older people might need to retire soon. In addition, who would be more energetic and enthusiastic than the young people. These people get engage in the government system are normally have strong will and are full of spirits to help develop their country.

 

In conclusion, the young politicians might be elated in national decisions, yet their effective contributions will help the government to control the country better.

 

Word: 250

 

Thank you!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is my essay , please have a look :

 

 

There are different types of music in the world today. Why do we need music? Is the national music of a country more important than the international music that is heard everywhere nowadays?

 

Nowadays various types of music are existed around the world. Depends on increasing different types of music, one question comes into mind that why we are demanding it? And is National music more preference than international one that have being all over the world? To answer these questions we’d better to concentrate on each types of music individually. I’m interested in both of them. I have many memorable things with traditional music and in contrast I make many friends with international music, so I’m interested in both of them

We listen to the music with various tensions, it’s completely related to our spiritual condition, and obviously reveal our aspect, for example in sorrow condition we ought to listen to the calm and sad music or in other hand in celebs we desire to listen joyful music, therefore it’s completely related to our psych.

national music exhibit traditional of a country and it’s a way to scatter their culture out to the other nationalities, it’s calmative music that retain culture and customs from one age to another, for example Irish music. Nowadays all over the words get familiar with their ceremonies and culture because they spread it by their traditional music.

In other hand international music as pop music is a general music which everyone around the world at least listen to ten number of it. The fan of this kind of music is greater because all universes have one thing in common together and it’s international music. This kind of music close people together they can communicate and debate together.

In conclusion, we need music in our lifestyle. We can be fresh with it. We find many friend so people close together by music.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

please rate this!

You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.As part of a class assignment you have to write about the following topic:

Disruptive school students have a negative influence on others. Students who are noisy and disobedient should be grouped together and taught separately.

Do you agree or disagree with this view? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your experience.

You should write at least 250 words.

This is really tough because lots of parameters involved in. yes, the character of everybody made on their childhood and mainly during their students. Therefore they can get more effects from their friends sometimes more than family, their point of view to the life is starting from that time and honestly I think friends are more important in this situation.

Students stay together at least 6 hours per day and sometimes they are in touch together after school time, they feel comfort together sometimes more than family and here is the point.

 

I believe family should take care of children by helping them to find the best possible character and point of view to the life, to better understand and deal with environment and challenges. Off course family can be more effective if you make positive environment for students, means all environment character is close together and trying to make positive progress and ideas.

If you don’t care of school environment then sometimes you have to fight with negative ideas coming from disruptive school students, we are not always powerful in such a challenges because sometimes we don’t have enough time to spend with our children.

 

The point is, if we don’t have enough money to change the school then we have to supervise our children and friends behavior and warn them in case needed, spend more time together to be effective, understand each other feeling and trying to give them enough space to make small mistakes, and so on …

Even you choose better available schools again you have to do above mentioned procedure but with less pressure and conerns.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

please guide me by this one

 

Should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth with poorer nations by providing them with things such as food and education? Or is this the responsibility of the governments of poorer nations to look after their citizens?

 

 

Nowadays some people believes that wealthy nations must share their properties with poorer nations that can’t provide things as food or education, but on the contrary, the other consider that this huge responsibilities should be tackle by their government not other wealthy nations.

 

I’m completely agree with first group who consider other wealthy nations shouldn't overlook the poorer nations , it’s totally related to human-being and we should condolence and sympathy with others by providing them such a background as providing education chance. We should assist some nations that face with some disasters such as famine, drought, earthquake and etc. it’s just a way to express our sympathy.

 

The better way is improving education, they can construct their country by themselves so one way is to enhancing education and have a chance for leading at least a small region, so they have enough enthusiasm to improve their country, and if in one country people get progress no one try to immigrate to other countries and stay to his mother country beside his relatives, so I want to say that immigration is leave poor situation and just go to developed country.

 

Therefore if other wealthy nations help poorer one, they can avoid many hazards after that and also improve their life level. In other hand they can stop immigration and stay on their home country and build it. So with this approach, world become more beautiful and people get close to each other by helping each other.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

You have seen an advertisement in an English newspaper for a job working in the City Museum shop during the holidays.

You decide to apply for the job. Write a letter to the director of the Museum. In your letter:

· introduce yourself

· explain what experience and special skills you have

· explain why you are interested in the job

 

Dear Sir/madam,

I have seen your advertisement about a job working in City Museum shop in holidays. My name is ........... and I’m 28 years old and my English language is quiet well. I can speak fluently however you will understand in interview time if you giving me a chance to have a meeting face to face,

Actually from my early youth I have interested in ancient articles specially some stuff that belong our ancestors. I believe that these priceless things should be more attendant. Therefore with this passion I read a lot about the articles and almost know more that for instance in which year they found out and what kind of group find them. So it’s really fascinating that all visitors should know, I believe that increasing general knowledge about something special could enhance people eagerness to following it and also come to Museum.

I could be a good advertisement, passionate could motivate people to care more about their countries and also persuade other nationalities to come and visit their Museum so I thing I’m good in leading a group of people and talk more about museum articles ,I would be glad to share my knowledge and I reckon it’s honorable.

Thank you in advance and I’m waiting for your kind reply .

Yours faithfully,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

CAN SOMEONE GRADE THIS GENERAL TRAINING WRITING TASK 1

To whom it may concern

Dear Sir/Madam,

I am writing to you with great dissatisfaction and regret. Allow me to elaborate why I am so perturbed. Actually, I am staying in accommodation provided by college in B wing , Room No 301 which is twin shared room and my roommate who has recently moved in, is very much self –obsessed person.

He is party lover with high music and lots of friends visting till late night everyday which causes dirty room,nasty plates,unbearable smell of left over food.Most of my things including important notes went missing. I have no comfort in sleeping and studying which is impacting my health as well as studies.

I am working hard to get my degree completed with distinction to get better chances of college placement so that I can repay my education loan. I will be really obliged if you can please provide me separate room in next term.

Hoping to receive your supporting reply,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

What are the factors which are related to an academic success in high-school students?

As we all know, education plays an important role in the development of a nation and the importance of building up a resume shows itself as high-school is the inevitable path to enter the academic world.

A recent announcement has been made on the part of the related authorities that starting the upcoming academic year, the GPA of the high-school students would be a decisive factor for them to make a progress academically. Experts are of the belief that facilities should be made available for the students in order for them to approach success. They believe measures should be taken by the government to provide schools with the essential requirements such as libraries and sufficient learning kits.

The consensus on the other hand is that the government plays no important role in an individual’s success and that perseverance is all it takes for the children to make leaps. It is actually due to the fact that it has been proven that hard work finally pays off.

Having discussed the matter from different angles and dimensions one comes to the understanding that hard working and availability of necessary stuff are directly associated with one another. For instance studying hard has no result if one suffers lack of auxiliary books at school. I firmly believe that so many factors are needed to make a winner out of high-school and the most important one is being able to focus on your future and therefore ignoring every other distraction that comes along the way. This may come a bit too hard, but if you saw the bigger picture it would lessen the pain.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Hi Behbahani,

The introduction is a 5.0. The structure is fine, but the grammar makes it difficult to understand (particularly the first and last sentence). Do not use 'whereas' or 'besides' until your English is stronger. The examiners will not notice:)

 

The body paragraphs look like a low 6.0. The grammar is much better (although you do use a lot of simple sentences).

 

The conclusion is a 5.5. You state your opinion, but there is no summary (scientists are not mentioned). Because of this, you end with a crazy set of statements. "To sum up, I stand for the latter opinion which means I do agree artists deserve more value. They should be supported and treated well by societies " is pretty good. Put a summary before this and you will get an easy 6.0.

 

Overall, you should get a 5.5, but a 6.0 is close. Go to school. They will sort you out in a month.

 

Mike

Link to comment
Share on other sites

please mark my essay..

 

What are the factors which are related to an academic success in high-school students?

As we all know, education plays an important role in the development of a nation and the importance of building up a resume shows itself as high-school is the inevitable path to enter the academic world.

A recent announcement has been made on the part of the related authorities that starting the upcoming academic year, the GPA of the high-school students would be a decisive factor for them to make a progress academically. Experts are of the belief that facilities should be made available for the students in order for them to approach success. They believe measures should be taken by the government to provide schools with the essential requirements such as libraries and sufficient learning kits.

The consensus on the other hand is that the government plays no important role in an individual’s success and that perseverance is all it takes for the children to make leaps. It is actually due to the fact that it has been proven that hard work finally pays off.

Having discussed the matter from different angles and dimensions one comes to the understanding that hard working and availability of necessary stuff are directly associated with one another. For instance studying hard has no result if one suffers lack of auxiliary books at school. I firmly believe that so many factors are needed to make a winner out of high-school and the most important one is being able to focus on your future and therefore ignoring every other distraction that comes along the way. This may come a bit too hard, but if you saw the bigger picture it would lessen the pain.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Q) Being a celebrity such as famous film star or sports personality – brings problems as well as benefits.

Do you think that being a celebrity brings more benefits or problems?

 

 

Ans)

 

 

 

Celebrities are most popular icons in the world. Getting a celebrity status is not an easy job. The person who achieves highest level among all people by hard work known as celebrity. Undoubtedly, the famous people have gained lots of benefits that common man doesn’t gain. Although, some society individuals think that famousness brings lot of downsides to the people, I believe that it brings innumerable number if benefits such as money and social status.

 

Celebrities are gaining lots of money in and around the work. They can earn lots of money with less amount of period compared to common people who are living in community. For example, Dhoni, A famous and popular Indian cricketer has gained 20000000 dollars money for an advertisement that he acted for a famous worldwide company. This was happened because of his fame in sports. This amount is not equivalent to a common school teacher whose pay is far less than him. It is clear that being a celebrity would have positive effect in their life and this is one of the two reasons that person can get as a celebrity.

High level social status, the celebrities has acquired than a normal people. Celebrities are role models, they can motivate the people towards their success. For Instance, Amitabh Bachan, A famous well known person and popular Indian star has gained high status, by administrating a lot of shows and involved in many social activities.

 

In conclusion, celebrities such as famous people have a lot of benefits such as economically sound and high level status. Therefore, I strongly believe that, being a famous personality people has got immense amount of advantages than a drawbacks. It is better said that if celebrity spends the money towards society growth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Mike could you grade my essay ?

 

Convenience foods will become increasigly prevalent and eventually replace traditional foods and traditioanal methods of food prepration.

to what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion.

 

 

Some people think that the convenience foods will become prevalent more and more everyday and eventually they will replace traditional foods and traditional methods of food preparation. I am going to discuss that is unlikely to happen.

 

After the Industrial revolation, time became the new instrument for measuring the productivty and it become more important in people's daily life. Becasue of lack of time, people have started to have less spare time than they used to, sleep less than they used to and spend less time for their eating habits than they used to. Today convenience foods are the great time savers for the people and because of this, convenience foods become more prevalent than they had never been before. People who are working and studying usually don't have enough time and energy to prepare a traditional breakfast or a dinner and convenience foods are very effective for them. The best example for how convenience foods change our eating habits is breakfast serials. In last 20 years the consumption of breakfast serial per person in a day in USA rose from 12 grams to 25 grams. That shows us people don't spent time for eating and preparing breakfasts like they used to.

 

On the other hand, food is the biggest part of many cultures and leaving behind the old habits is not easy as it seems. Even the convenience foods are great time savers if a convenience food is not fit a country's cuisine it will probably have a limited effect on changing the eating habits. For example in Italy, some international companies have started to sell Korean noodles and ramens which artifically modified with italian tastes. Even though they are cheaper and more easy to prepare than the italian pasta, traditional italian pasta is still the market's leader.

 

Another reason which stops the convenience foods replacing traditional foods and traditional methods of food preparation is the health issues. As a well known fact, most of the convenience foods are unhealty and consuming that type of food for a long period can couse many disesaes like diabetesi obesity or cardiovasculer diseases.

 

Overall because of the traditional eating and food preparation habits based on the culture in many countries and obvious health concerns, even though the convenience foods are very easy to prepare and artifically teasty, it is not seem to be possible to have a great impact on people's eating and food preparation habits.

 

 

 

Thanks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Could you please check for me? :)

what is the pros and cons of publice transport?

In today is society, it is a common sight to see more and more people using public transport. For many, this is a way to protect environment and relax during the way to an office. But there is a concern about crimes when public transport gets overcrowded. In this essay, I will discuss about both sides, following by what I think is right.

Let is begin by looking at the upsides of using public transport. An increment of the number of passengers choosing buses, trolley cars and bullet trains means there will be a reduction of emissions and gases. Therefore, the air will be fresher and the global’s environment is protected.

Another advantage is you have more time to relax. Instead of driving yourself to a company, a driver will do that for you. While sitting on a chair, you can entertain by listen to music, read a book or even sleep in case of you have busy works the previous day.

Turning to the other side of the argument, crimes are a major problem. Many people think it is difficult to avoid pickpockets and robbers when board buses or trams. In the rush hour, a large number of passengers try to get in public transport as fast as possible is a big chance for those criminals. Although you know those are around, there is no way to keep your belongings safety while everybody is hurrying and trying to push, pull, break the queue. As a result, neither you board the bus nor keep the belongings.

To sum up, using public transport is either good or bad choice depends on you. Using vehicles that environmentally friendly is a benefit, in contrast, the drawback is lost money. Personally, I strongly believe using public transport is still the best choice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

http://www.www.urch.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=7016&stc=1

The graph gives information about the unemployment rate between young English people over a period from 1992 to 2014.

There were two main trends of youth unemployment level In two age groups precisely steady trend of 16-17 years old people and upward trend of citizen aged 18-24. Herewith the trend of the 18-24 years old people had similar trend of the whole youngster’s unemployment in that period.

In relation to the unemployment due people aged 18-24 in England over 22-year period these decreased from 1992 to 2002 and it rose from 2002 to 2012 (from almost 750 000 to 400 000 and from 400 000 to nearly 800 000 accordingly). In 2012 the trend had been broken and the unemployment rate fell down sharply from almost 800 000 to practically 600 000 young people.

At that time the level of 16-17 years old unemployment rate was steady from 1992 to 2012 and it went down fluently from 2002 to 2014 (almost 200 000 and from nearly 200 000 to practically 170 000 respectively).

 

 

 

Thanks a lot! I am very excited cause its the first essay i put online, please be tough to me , I know I have many things to work on. am looking forward to your comments..:-D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some people believe that the use of mobile phones in public is asannoying as smoking and should be banned, similarly to smoking. Give youropinion and examples from your own experience.

 

 

There is no doubt that talking loudly on cell phones in public is pretty much universally frowned upon. Many people hold the opinion that it is creating a nuisance in public places, therefore should be banned as smoking. I personally believe, despite complete banning of mobile phones,measures should be taken to tackle this issue wisely as it would be very difficult for people to switch off their phones.

There are multifarious reasons to support my view. First of all, in today’s fast paceof lifeno one wantsto be disconnectedfrom their links andcontacts from the rest of the world. In addition, people want to usetimewhile waitingfor their trains orbuses or during commute.By this way,they can be updated from current affairsaround the globe or can be linked to their favouritewebsite such as Facebook. Furthermore, cellphones, no doubt, are the cheapest and effective way of connectionto ourloved ones, no matter where you are. Apparently, in case of anyemergiency , it is one of the bestmodesof a communication.Having said that, I would emphasis the importance of education and etiquettes for variouslocationsto let the users knowwhenit is not appropriateto use their phones. Forinstance, in hospital, there are some healthand safety issueslinked with the signal and medical equipments. So, mobilephones should strictly be bannedin thoseareas. Similarly, technology can apply on other public places. By usingsubvoccal microphones/software and by keeping their phones either on silent mode or vibration modes, people can minimize the noise which causes thedisturbance to others.

To conclude, although talking loudly in public places is annoying, banning the cell phones completly is notthe right solution. Education should be given to cell phone users to follow the ethics of using technology effectively.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

[h=2]please evaluate my writing task 1[/h]

 

The given pie chart shows the number of visitors to a local cinema according to age in 2000.

The chart illustrates and compares the popularity of cinema visiting among different group of ages. We can see that people aged 55 and older are the most popular visitors, about half (51%) of local cinema visitors are from this age. People aged between 10-15 get in the second place of popularity as about 21% of the total local cinema visitors number are among those ages. Then, with about 6% less than the last group the third group comes, they are people of ages between 16-20 they are not commonly go to cinema. Also from the presented data in the chart we can see the two groups of ages that rarely go to the local cinema they are the people which aged between 21-30 and between 31-45 as the summation of their percentages doesn't exceed 13%, people aged 21-30 get 8% while whom aged 31-45 the lowest percentage 5% of the total visitor number.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Cell phones have changed the way we communicate

It is definitely obvious fact, that nowadays modern communication technologies such as cell phones are surprisingly developed and scientists are trying their best to ease our life than we have or had.

Firstly, in previous centuries people could not communicate with one another at a long distance in a few seconds. People hired carriers to send the letters to the destination place. Moreover, it took them a week, month or year to be delivered to the target person and they did not use to be done frequently. However today we can phone the friends, parents, business partners or others easily.

Secondly, with the help of the social applications for instance: Viber, WhatsApp, Skype, Tango, Facebook programs, downloaded in our devices not only we can phone any person having the same programs installed in the telephones without any charge all over the world, if the internet or Wi-Fi is available, but also send them video or text messages . Thanks to the video calling, we can see the relatives whom we miss or have not met for ages. Additionally, developing these kinds of technologies also enables us to acquaint with new people.

Finally, the examples and arguments given above show, that mobiles have changed society’s lifestyle cardinally. I strongly believe that scientists will advance today’s technologies. As widely-known, Skype has already innovated translator device which interprets speeches from English in Spanish and vice-versa and it provides clear communication between the English and Spanish speaking natives. In my view, scholars also will also invent a similar device for mobiles and the last one will solve many communication problems.

 

How do you like my essay?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Task II

You should spend about40 minutes on this task.

Write about thefollowing topic:

You should spend 40 minutes on this topic.

The mark of a successfulperson is to be wealthy and have a successful career.

To what extent do youagree or disagree?

Givereasons for your answer and include any relevant examplesfrom your own knowledge and experience.

Write at least 250words.

There is no denying ofthe fact that a person’s success is judged by his career and wealth. I totallyagree with this statement and will provide numerous reasons to prove the same.

Everyone in this worldwants to have a good career path and big bank balance. In this competitiveworld everyone is trying to achieve the highest position in an organization. Onetries to have a good qualification to get a good job with a handsome salary sothat he can achieve in fulfilling his dreams of making wealth. Every business owner is trying to expand andmultiply his business, so that it adds to his wealth and he is known as asuccessful person. As per the famous magazine India today, Bill Gates andWarren Buffet were named as the most successful person in the world. The reasonis that they have immense wealth and extraordinary career. People with suchwealth and career are taken as role models because of their success.

When we have wealth weare respected in society and we feel we have achieved something. Growing alongthe career makes us feel successful. Everyone, in my family, says that mybrother is successful because he has a lot of wealth and he is the ManagingDirector in his company. The Cricketer’s likeof Sachin Tendulkar and Rickyponting are said to be successful because they have achieved the highest limitin their career. Mega Bollywood Star Mr Amitabh Bachan was treated as the mostsuccessful person when he was rising in his career and was receiving awards butwas said to be a failure when a downfall started in his career. As the sayinggoes “Everyone salutes the rising Sun”. Similarly, a person with high wealthand bright career is treated as a successful person.

To conclude, we can saya successful person is one who has a great wealth and a marvellous career.Achieving wealth and a good career is the milestone of being successful.

 

Can anyone please rate my essay

Thanks

Abhishek

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hello,

 

I would like to check my essay for general writing task - 2

 

The topic is : What are the advantages and disadvantages of technology in human life ?

 

My answer for same is :

 

This essay will explore the advantages and disadvantages of how technology has affected human lives. Over the last two decades, people have witnessed tremendous changes in their lives due to the technology. While this changes has lead to our life and work more convenient. It is also true that it comes with the several negative impacts also.

 

 

One of the major changes which technology has made is the concept of multitasking. For example, you can check your emails while picking items from the grocery store or can attend a business conference while taking care for sick child at home. Another change which I would like to highlight is the possibility of faster communication. For an instance, if child needs any urgent help then s/he can call parents or ask for permission to do something over the phone.

 

Nothing comes without the cost so as the technology also has some drawbacks. Before the use of technology in our routine lives, we were closer to our family, friends and relatives, we used to meet once in a week or in a month, seat together for dinner and discussed what is going on the life or so. But now days it happens only once in a while coz everyone are more connected towards to machines rather to the humans. Life is also not private now because wherever we go , we always feel that someone is watching us or spying on us.

 

I would like to conclude this with my opinion that we should use technology to make our life easier but must not be heavily dependent on technology. Now choice is of people that what they want to choose.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi,

 

Could anybody please check my essay and tell how much band's worth it has.

 

A growing number of people feel that animals should not be exploited by people and that they should have the same rights as humans, while others argue that humans must employ animals to satisfy their various needs, including uses for food and research.

Discuss both views and give your opinion.

 

It is a hot debate nowadays that whether humans should kill animals for their advantage or not. While some people think that it is justifiable, others are of the point of view that this should be banned. This essay will discuss both points and at the end I will conclude it and will give my opinion.

 

To Begin with, firstly, it is proven fact that animals feel pain in the same way as we feel. As a result of this truth, if a man tortured them, it would be treated as cruelity. As we could observe that many medical students dissect frogs for just experiments, so they are troubling this creature in this way. Thus this is an example of an uncivilized society. Hence, this should be given up and the rights of a safe life should be given to them.

 

Secondly, animals have the same kind of emotions as humans. This could be observed clearly, when a hen shows his love and affection to her chickens by always keeping them under her features. Therefore, if we harm the hen due to any reason, her babies will suffer, as they will be deprived from their mother. Obviously, this is unethical and immoral. So their rights must be protected.

 

On the other hand, some people say that it is perfectly alright to use animals for our needs. In this regard, they put forward an argument that we are a superior creature and all other animals are born for satisfying our needs. Consequently, if we need food, it will be fine to slaughter them. In this way we are using them as per law of nature. Therefore, there rights void in such circumstances.

 

Similarly, if we give them the status same as humans, we will not be able to survive. It is due to the fact, that in many occasions, we need to kill them in order to keep ourselves alive. For example, when we breath, thousands of germs are killed inside our body. On the contrary, if we wished to protect their lives, we would have to stop our respiration system. Thus we would be inviting death in this way which is unacceptable. Hence same right could not be given to them.

 

In conclusion, both groups have their own arguments in this matter. However, by giving the same rights to animals may lead to many troubles for mankind. For example they cannot enjoy delicious foods in which meat is used. In addition, as in this way, animals will no more be used for the experiments, so invention of different medicines will become impossible. Thus, it is inevitable to use animals for satisfaction of humanity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 3 weeks later...

Hello! Would you grade it, please?

 

The continued rise in the world’s population is the greatest problem faced by humanity at the present times. What are the causes of this continued rise?

Do you agree that it is the biggest problem faced by humanity?

 

The progress in medicine ensured that most people nowadays live long enough to procreate offsprings and the children mortality is low. Scientists estimate that by 2050 there would be 9 billion people living on this planet. It means that there is a real danger that one day the humanity will use up the exhaustible natural resources which it needs to survive.

 

Many governments have been trying to present a solution to the problem of overpopulation. China, where every family is allowed to have only one child, is an example of successful implementation of birth control policy. In India, however, low-educated people ignore the law for the sake of traditions. In Africa the impoverished families are usually large because children can work and support the family. Although AIDS, TB and cancer are responsible for millions of deaths every year the birth rates still outweigh the rates of mortality. Many religions prohibit using protection which means women bear as many children as they can.

 

In my opinion, if the growth of population doesn’t stop the consequences would be terrible. Cutting down more woods, plowing up virgin lands and building new power stations would cause the deterioration of ecological situation. The poorest countries would be the first to experience the lack of food and fresh water while the developed nations who control most resources will suffer from an increasing migration flow. When faced with existential threats, people become violent and a world war is a possibility. In conclusion, the solution of demographic problem is a priority because the future of all humankind depends on it.

263 words

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Hello! Please, check my essay. Thanks a lot)

Using a computer every day, can have more negative that positive effects on your children. Do you agree or disagree? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant example from your own knowledge or experience.

 

Computer technology has changed the lives of children of all ages. While this technology has its benefits, primarily in education and access to information, it can also be detrimental to children's health. I tend to agree that young generation can be negatively affected by the time at the computer.

First of all, last research suggested, that using the computer is a very sedentary activity, which causes health problems as headache, hand injuries, back pains. Furthermore, regular computer using can affect a child's attention span and focus. The worst problem of young regular users is computer addiction, which is very difficult to stop.

Secondly, computer using is also a highly solitary activity. I strongly believe, that the children, who spend more time than their peers near the display, may fail to develop appropriate social skills. Pediatricians are confirmed that underdeveloped social skills can result in loneliness and depression, which are detrimental to health and relationships.

To sum up, it is essential that parents and school teachers should understand the implications of computer usage. More research is necessary to determine the recommendations that maximize the benefits and minimize the negative effects of home computers on children;s lives.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

In recent years, obesity becomes a major problem in most of the countries, especially in youngsters. Nowadays, it is sparked much debate that governments should levy a tariff on junk foods to curb the health problems. I believe that, government authorities must charge heavy tax on unhealthy food as the collected money will use for the diseases caused by it and it will also refrain people to consume more fast food.

 

Firstly, large amount expected to get from such levy as most of the people are addicted of eating junk foods. This amount can use for the cure of various common diseases arise through consuming more unhealthy eating. Moreover, this money could also be used for the awareness of health issues related to this dangerous addict. For example, in United Kingdom money collected from tax on cigarette uses to control lung cancer and heart disease.

 

Secondly, due to increasing rates everyone cannot afford fast food. Consequently, related health issues will also decreases due to decrease in consumption rate. For example, consumption of

cigarettes and alcohols are controlled through high tax rate in most of the countries. Furthermore, this will also have beneficial impact on local farming, as people diverted to vegetables and

other healthy foods.

 

To sum up, by imposing duty on junk food government not only generate enough revenue to control the corresponding diseases and awareness of these diseases but also it will result consumption of the same. I am in consummate accord, as I believe that, levy a tariff will have sheer impact on consumption of unhealthy food.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...